 |
|
| 《藏文大藏經》概述：其歷史、系譜及研究資源彙整=Tibetan Buddhist Canon: Its History, Genealogy, and Research Resources | ||
| 作者 | 谷有量 (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly |
| 卷期 | n.113 |
| 出版日期 | 2025.06.25 |
| 頁次 | 49 - 130 |
| 出版者 | 正觀雜誌社 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.tt034.org.tw/ |
| 出版地 | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 藏文大藏經=Tibetan Buddhist Canon; 甘珠爾=Kanjur; 丹珠爾=Tanjur; 系譜=genealogy; 藏學=Tibetology |
| 摘要 | 《藏文大藏經》，亦即甘珠爾與丹珠爾的研究，在西方學術界已經相當成熟，但在亞洲，尤其是華語學術界，尚屬起步階段。《藏文大藏經》本身具有豐富的研究價值，不僅可以做版本比對和翻譯，也可以做漢藏對照的研究。西方學者自1980年代開始以Helmut Eimer為首，以及Paul Harrison、Peter Skilling和Helmut Tauscher等人，領導著甘珠爾與丹珠爾的研究。在亞洲則有日本以羽田野伯猷、原田覺和白館戒雲對甘珠爾歷史與已故學者辛嶋靜志對其系譜作研究，在中國有周潤年、扎呷、布楚和尖仁色做概述性研究，及在臺灣有林純瑜與蘇南望傑等學者投入研究。即便中國有豐富的藏學人才以及國際級的藏學研究中心，也做了《中華大藏經》的藏文校勘版，但對於《藏文大藏經》的研究仍不及外國學者，這或許值得相關單位重視。 本論文將針對《藏文大藏經》的四個面向做研究：一）甘珠爾的歷史和組成，二）甘珠爾版本的系譜研究，三）丹珠爾歷史與系譜研究及，四）《藏文大藏經》的研究現況與資源彙整。 《藏文大藏經》藏書豐富，不僅可以補充漢文大藏經不足之處，其本身也涵蓋了印度晚期大乘佛教的經典與密續而受到矚目。除此之外，無論是版本學、翻譯、或是研究藏傳佛教思想，都必須深入研究《藏文大藏經》。《藏文大藏經》的甘珠爾分為四種主要系統，丹珠爾則分為二種系統。雖然目前在國際間《藏文大藏經》研究已趨於成熟，但華語學術界的研究仍然有限，而本文期能補充此方面之不足。=The study of Tibetan Buddhist Canon, comprised of Kanjur and Tanjur, has reached maturity in Western academia, while research in Asia, particularly within Chinese academic circles, is still in its nascent stages. The Tibetan Buddhist Canon offers abundant research opportunities, including textual criticism, translation studies, and comparative analysis between Chinese and Tibetan sources. Since the 1980s, prominent scholars such as Helmut Eimer, Paul Harrison, Peter Skilling, and Helmut Tauscher have established foundational methodologies for Kanjur and Tanjur studies. In Asia, countries like Japan, China and Taiwan have relatively few researchers dedicated to this field. Despite China’s numerous distinguished Tibetologists, respected institutions like the China Tibetology Research Center, and the production of a collated edition of the Kanjur and Tanjur, research on the Tibetan Buddhist Canon still significantly trails behind Western scholarship. This paper examines four dimensions of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon: 1) the historical development of the Kanjurs, 2) the genealogy relationship between Kanjurs editions, 3) the history and genealogy of the Tanjurs, and 4) the available resources and current research status of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon. The Tibetan Buddhist Canon contains a wealth of texts that not only supplement gaps in the Chinese Buddhist Canon but also preserve scriptures and tantras from late Indian Mahayana Buddhism. Furthermore, whether one's focus is on textual criticism, translation studies, or doctrinal analysis, a thorough investigation of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon is essential. Although the study of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon has reached sophistication internationally, research within Chinese academic communities remains limited, and this paper aims to address this scholarly gap. |
| 目次 | 一、前言 52 二、文獻探討 57 三、西藏大藏經的翻譯與成型 60 四、甘珠爾的系譜簡述 73 五、丹珠爾的歷史與系譜研究 90 六、《藏文大藏經》的研究現況與資源彙整 99 七、結論 109 |
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 1 |
| 建檔日期 | 2026.01.27 |
| 更新日期 | 2026.01.30 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
