 |
|
| Schisms in Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | Cole, Alan (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Sacred Schisms: How Religions Divide |
| 出版日期 | 2009.05 |
| 頁次 | 61 - 82 |
| 出版者 | Cambridge University Press |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.cambridge.org/ |
| 出版地 | Cambridge, UK [劍橋, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 專題研究論文=Research Paper |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 摘要 | While popular notions of Buddhism in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have often assumed that Buddhism is, and was, as poised, polished, and monochromatic as those charming jade Buddha-statues found in Asian-American restaurants, a bit of familiarity with Buddhist history suggests otherwise. In fact, it would probably be no exaggeration to say that the history of Buddhism, in the twenty-five centuries since the Buddha's death, could be told as a series of schismatic developments. To make sense of this fractious history, this chapter will present a thumbnail account of the evolution of Buddhism in India, Tibet, and East Asia, along with some brief comments about Buddhism in the Occident. In offering this historical overview of Buddhist schisms, which will be by definition partial and minimalist, I have selected particular developments based on whether they either add something to our appreciation of the vicissitudes of the Buddhist tradition, or provide potentially useful information for comparative reflections. In light of the material found in the Buddhist tradition, I believe we will do fine defining “schism” simply as “a publicly recognized division within a religious group.” As in any tradition, such a division could emerge from disagreements over doctrine, history, leadership, practices, or institutional arrangements. In defining “schism” in this broad manner, the point is not just that schisms result from differences of opinion over an issue, but also that these differences have been elevated into “identity-producing” divides. |
| ISBN | 9780521881470 (hc) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581038.004 |
| 點閱次數 | 1 |
| 建檔日期 | 2025.10.19 |
| 更新日期 | 2025.10.19 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
