 |
|
| 初期ヴァイシェーシカ学派における6カテゴリー説の検討=Six-Category Systems in the Early Vaiśeṣika School | ||
| 作者 | 渡邉眞儀 (著)=Watanabe, Masayoshi (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.72 n.2 (總號=n.162) |
| 出版日期 | 2024.03.20 |
| 頁次 | 950 - 946 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 著者：東京大学大学院単位取得退学 |
| 關鍵詞 | Vaiśeṣikasūtra; 『方便心論』; 玄奘; 吉蔵; プラシャスタパーダ |
| 摘要 | The great Vaiśeṣika philosopher Praśastapāda classified existence into six categories in his Padārthadharmasaṃgraha （PDhS）. These six are: substance, quality, action, universal, particularity, and inherence. On the other hand, the classification in the earliest Vaiśeṣika text, the Vaiśeṣikasūtra （VS）, is more obscure. In this paper, I examine information in texts in the Chinese Buddhist canon, and clarify two variations of the six-category system in the early Vaiśeṣika school. The first type, which I call the “Xuanzang type,” encompasses substance, quality, action, being, particular universality, and inherence. This type seems older than the other six-category system type in India, but was probably introduced into China later by Xuanzang and his disciples. The second type is the “PDhS type,” which follows the same six-category system as that in PDhS. This type gradually became standard in India; however, in China, the delayed introduction of the Xuanzang type overshadowed the PDhS type, and Chinese Buddhism soon forgot the latter. |
| 目次 | 1．はじめに 950 2．VS におけるカテゴリー数の推定 950 3．漢訳仏典および中国撰述文献における六句義説 949 4．結論 947 （一次文献および略号） 946 （二次文献） 946 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.72.2_950 |
| 點閱次數 | 12 |
| 建檔日期 | 2025.03.06 |
| 更新日期 | 2025.10.30 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
