![]() |
|
| Brahmasūtra Śaṅkara-bhāṣya(BSŚ)におけるanirvacanīya:avidyāとnāmarūpaに関して=Anirvacanīya in the Brahmasūtra Śaṅkara-bhāṣya (BSŚ) on avidyā and nāmarūpa | ||
| 作者 | 岡崎智加 (著)=Okazaki, Chika (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.72 n.2 (總號=n.162) |
| 出版日期 | 2024.03.20 |
| 頁次 | 945 - 942 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 著者所属:京都大学大学院 |
| 關鍵詞 | anirvacanīya; avidyā; nāmarūpa; シャンカラ; 不二一元論 |
| 摘要 | The concept of anirvacanīya may have already been used as a technical term of the non-dualism school in Śaṅkara’s time (756–772AD), but there are clear differences in its usage between Śaṅkara and many later non-dualists. Śaṅkara did not use the word anirvacanīya on avidyā in the BSŚ. This contrasts obviously with the frequent use of anirvacanīya with regard to avidyā by many post-Śaṅkara non-dualists, and its use with sadasadbhyām is also characteristic. On the other hand, it is also characteristic that Śaṅkara used anirvacanīya only with nāmarūpa in the BSŚ, and in that case it was always accompanied by tattvānyatvābhyām. The aim of this paper is to clarify why Śaṅkara used anirvacanīya in this way, based on previous studies. Śaṅkara’s annotation on nāmarūpa is particularly important for confirming his view of the relationship between Brahman and the phenomenal world. Bhāmatī (Bhā) by Vācaspati Miśra (around 10AD), the annotation for BSŚ, will also be compared with it. |
| 目次 | 0.はじめに 945 1.Anir 概念の発生と変遷 945 2.avidyā と Anir 945 3.Nā と Anir 944 3.1. BSŚ 944 3.2. Bhā 944 3.3. tattva の意味 943 4. まとめ 943 4.1. avidyā に対する Anir の不使用 943 4.2. 何故 Ś は Nā にのみ Anir を使用したのか 943 〈参考文献〉 942 (略号および一次文献) 942 (二次文献) 942 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.72.2_945 |
| 點閱次數 | 1 |
| 建檔日期 | 2025.03.06 |
| 更新日期 | 2025.10.30 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
