 |
|
| Prajñāvarmanの説くUdānavarga編纂の経緯について=Prajñāvarman’s View of the Compilation of the Udānavarga | ||
| 作者 | 竹田龍永 (著)=Takeda, Tatsunori (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.72 n.2 (總號=n.162) |
| 出版日期 | 2024.03.20 |
| 頁次 | 816 - 813 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 著者所属：京都大学大学院 |
| 關鍵詞 | Udānavarga; Udānavargavivaraṇa; Prajñāvarman |
| 摘要 | The Udānavargavivaraṇa, a commentary on the Udānavarga, is an important source for understanding how the Udānavarga was received in later periods. This paper focuses on the process of compilation of the Udānavarga, which may provide a clue to the ideological position of the author of its commentary, Prajñāvarman. He presents a biography of Dharmatrāta in the opening part of the Udānavargavivaraṇa, claiming that Dharmatrāta compiled the Udānavarga during the lifetime of the Buddha. He then presents a supposed objection that there may be a “contradiction with the Vaibhāṣika theory” and a response to it. This argument has already been taken up in a preceding study as suggesting that Prajñāvarman was not a Vaibhāṣika, and this paper re-examines this interpretation with reference to parallel passages found in texts related to the Sarvāstivāda. As a result, by considering the “contradiction with the Vaibhāṣika theory” as a question of the compilation period of the Udānavarga, I show that Prajñāvarman can be understood as acknowledging the authority of the Vaibhāṣikas, and that it is not possible to conclude that Prajñāvarman was not a Vaibhāṣika from this discussion alone. |
| 目次 | はじめに 816 1．先行研究 816 2．有部関連文献にみられる「毘婆沙師説」 815 3．有部の議論を踏まえた再検討 815 まとめ 814 〈略号表〉 813 〈参考文献〉 813 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.72.2_816 |
| 點閱次數 | 1 |
| 建檔日期 | 2025.02.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2025.10.30 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
