![]() |
|
| トルポパの説く基体(gzhi):『山法了義大海』と『現観荘厳論註』を中心として=The Foundation (gzhi) as Described by Dol po pa: Focusing on the Ri chos nges don rgya mtsho and His Commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra | ||
| 作者 | 谷口富士夫 (著)=Taniguchi, Fujio (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.72 n.1 (總號=n.161) |
| 出版日期 | 2023.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 345 - 338 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 『山法了義大海』; 『現観荘厳論』トルポパ註; 基体; gzhi |
| 摘要 | The Tibetan words gzhi lam ’bras gsum (the three, i.e., ground, path, and fruition) are usually regarded as being used in the same sense as the Sanskrit words viṣaya, prayoga, and phala (scope, practice, and fruition). However, Dol po pa Shes rab rgyal mtshan (1292–1361) does not always use gzhi as viṣaya in either his main work, the Ri chos nges don rgya mtsho (RNG), or his commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra (DDT). Some examples that cannot be interpreted as “scope” are provided. Analysis shows that the usage of gzhi in RNG encompasses all stages of religious training from ordinary individuals to the Buddha, and it is distinguished into four types: base type, fruition type, path type, and impurity type. In contrast, while there is a base type in the usage of gzhi in DDT, there is no fruition type, and the usage corresponding to “scope,” in the form of “wisdom in which the base and fruition cannot be distinguished,” is prominent. |
| 目次 | はじめに 345 1.トルポパの著作における基 ・ 道 ・ 果 345 2.RNG における基体 344 3.DDT における基体 341 4.結論 339 〈参考文献〉 339 (一次資料 ・ 略号) 339 (二次文献) 338 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.72.1_345 |
| 點閱次數 | 108 |
| 建檔日期 | 2025.01.08 |
| 更新日期 | 2025.01.15 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
