 |
|
| 智周『梵網経菩薩戒本疏』の撰述について：唯識教学の影響を中心に=On the Characteristic of the Commentary on the Bodhisattva Precept Code in the Brahma’s Net Sūtra by Zhizhou: Focusing on the Influence of Yogācāra Doctrine | ||
| 作者 | 金柳冏 (著)=Kim, Ryu-kyung (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.72 n.1 (總號=n.161) |
| 出版日期 | 2023.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 309 - 306 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 梵網戒; 智周; 理仏性・行仏性; 真如常住; 法蔵 |
| 摘要 | Among the five volumes of Zhizhou’s （智周; 668–723） Commentary on the Bodhisattva Precept Code in the Brahma’s Net Sūtra （Fanwangjing pusa jieben shu 梵網経菩薩戒本疏）, only volumes two and four are extant. It is believed that it was not affected by Yogācāra doctrines, but comprehensively depended on the Tiantai （天台） tradition. It has also been commonly accepted that it was based on Fazang’s （法蔵） Commentary on the Bodhisattva Precept Code in the Brahma’s Net Sūtra （Fanwangjing pusa jieben shu 梵網經菩薩戒本疏, T. 1813）, and Zhizhou shows his critical attitude toward it. In this paper, I investigate the effect of Yogācāra doctrines in the commentary of Zhizhou, and attempt to infer the date of his work, the results of which are as follows: First, Zhizhou interpreted the Buddha nature in the Brahma’s Net Sūtra in two ways: the Buddha nature as the principle （li foxing 理仏性）, and the Buddha nature acquired through practice （xing foxing 行仏性）, both of which are Yogācāra terms. Moreover, he criticized the argument of Fazang, who claims the changing of truth according to conditions （zhenru suiyuan 真如随縁）. By contrast, Zhizou emphasized the eternal dwelling of the truth （zhenru changzhu 真如常住）. Second, Zhizhou used Yogācāra terms such as “opening and sealing - casting away and establishing” （kaihe feili 開合廃立） and the “changing according to the principle” （suichuan li 随転理）, respected the translations of Xuanzang （玄奘）, and referred to the contents of the Brahma’s Net Sūtra which are cited by the Yogācāra Masters Shengzang （勝荘） and Wŏnch’ŭk （円測）. Third, considering the fact that there are some citations of Yijing’s （義浄） Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinayasaṃgraha （Genben sapoduobu lüshe 根本薩婆多部律摂） and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya （Genben shuoyiqie youbu pinaiye 根本説一切有部毘奈耶） in Fazang’s commentary, which was frequently cited by Zhizhou, his commentary might have been written at least after 701. Therefore, it can be inferred that Zhizhou’s commentary might have been affected by the Yogācāra Schoo,l and composed when he was a disciple of Huizhao （慧沼）. |
| 目次 | 1．はじめに 309 2．『智周疏』に見られる唯識教学 309 3．『智周疏』に見られる唯識学派の影響とその撰述年代 307 4．おわりに 306 〈一次文献〉 306 〈二次文献〉 306 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.72.1_309 |
| 點閱次數 | 49 |
| 建檔日期 | 2025.01.08 |
| 更新日期 | 2025.01.15 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
