 |
|
| 動詞anu-śī-をめぐる誤解：AbhidharmakośabhāṣyaとAbhidharmadīpa-Vibhāṣāprabhāvṛtti=Misunderstandings of the Verb anu-śī-: Abhidharmakośabhāṣya and Abhidharmadīpa-Vibhāṣāprabhāvṛtti | ||
| 作者 | 藤本庸裕 (著)=Fujimoto, Yosuke (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.71 n.2 (總號=n.159) |
| 出版日期 | 2023.03.22 |
| 頁次 | 871 - 866 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | （本稿は，2022年度早稲田大学特定課題研究による研究成果の一部である．） |
| 關鍵詞 | 随眠; 随増; 世親; 倶舎論; アビダルマディーパ |
| 摘要 | Anuśaya is one of the most important concepts in the Sarvāstivādin system. Its literal meaning is “that which attaches to （an object）,” and it refers to the defilements that must be abandoned in order to attain awakening. The verb anu-śī-, from which anuśaya is derived, similarly means “to attach oneself to.” At some point in its history, however, the Sarvāstivādins came to interpret anu-śī- to mean “to grow,” as is indicated by the renderings in Tibetan and by Xuanzang, rgyas par ’gyur ba and suízēng 隨増, respectively. Their reason for doing so is uncertain, but scholars seem to agree that Vasubandhu （ca. 4-5th c. CE） uses the verb in that sense in his Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. In this article, I challenge this view by examining the two similes that Vasubandhu gives when explaining the function of anu-śī-. I first argue that he takes the verb anu-śī- to mean “to attach oneself to,” not “to grow.” I then analyze a passage from the Abhidharmadīpa-Vibhāṣāprabhāvṛtti （ca. 6th c. CE）, which criticizes Vasubandhu’s definition of impure factors （sāsrava-dharma）, pointing out that the author of the text assumes that Vasubandhu used the verb anu-śī- in the sense of “growing” and rejects that use of the word. Through this analysis and by using other commentarial sources, I conclude that there already was a strong interpretive tendency in India to take the verb anu-śī- in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya to mean “to grow,” contrary to the author’s own intention, and that Vasubandhu and the unknown author of the Abhidharmadīpa-Vibhāṣāprabhāvṛtti, the two main Sarvāstivādin scholars of a later period, did not follow that interpretation. |
| 目次 | 1．問題の所在 871 2．AKBh における動詞 anu-śī- の意味 870 3．ヴァスバンドゥによる有漏法の定義に対する ADV の批判 869 4．まとめ 867 〈参考文献〉 867 （一次文献と略号） 867 （二次文献） 867 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.2_871 |
| 點閱次數 | 133 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.11.04 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.11.08 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
