![]() |
|
| 有分心,中有,補特伽羅,阿頼耶識に関する一考察=Bhavaṅgacitta, Antarābhava, Pudgala, and Ālayavijñāna | ||
| 作者 | 香山 (著)=鄭景珍 (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.71 n.2 (總號=n.159) |
| 出版日期 | 2023.03.22 |
| 頁次 | 843 - 838 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 有分心; 中有; 補特伽羅; 阿頼耶識; 命根 |
| 摘要 | Bhavaṅgacitta, antarābhava, pudgala and ālayavijñāna are here compared with the concepts of jīvitindriya, bīja and momentariness from synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and the background related to the transition of ideas from each source is examined. We found that life-sustaining jīvitindriya was accepted from non-Buddhists even in nirodhasamāpatti regardless of whether or not there was citta, and bhavaṅga and antarābhava, which were involved in the problems of saṃsāra after death, as well as pudgala, ālayavijñāna and bhavaṅgacitta, which were responsible for the intramundane process of karman and its maturation. In addition, the Yogācāras considered that they were able to establish ālayavijñāna as citta dharma in the form of supplementing the momentariness of the Sarvāstivādins, and that the Theravāda were able to put bhavaṅgacitta into the category of citta dharma by adopting relative momentariness. |
| 目次 | 1.はじめに 843 2.有分心と中有 843 3.補特伽羅と阿頼耶識 841 4.おわりに 839 〈略号〉 838 〈参考文献〉 838 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.2_843 |
| 點閱次數 | 143 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.11.04 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.11.07 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
