![]() |
|
| インドにおける法身説法=The Preaching of the Dharmakāya in India | ||
| 作者 | 德重弘志 (著)=Tokushige, Hiroshi (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.71 n.2 (總號=n.159) |
| 出版日期 | 2023.03.22 |
| 頁次 | 799 - 794 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 法身説法; 空海; Padmavajra; Jñānavajra; Tathāgatahṛdayālaṃkāra |
| 摘要 | In Japanese Shingon Buddhism, the concept of hosshin seppō 法身説法, the preaching of the Dharmakāya, is crucial because it appears in several writings by its founder, Kūkai (A.D. 774-835). Kūkai cites several Mahāyāna and Tantric Buddhist scriptures as the basis for this concept, but the term “the preaching of the Dharmakāya” is not directly used in those texts. The question here is whether this concept was established in India prior to the period of Kūkai’s activity. An earlier study has found only one example of the use of this term in the commentary *Tantrārthāvatāra-vyākhyāna, written by Padmavajra, who was active in India at about the same time as Kūkai. However, this example is expressed in extremely brief sentences, and it is unclear how far back in time the concept could be established. The author has conducted an exhaustive survey of the relevant term in the literature established in India to clarify this issue. The results show that Padmavajra in India proposed this concept, which developed until around the 12th century. Therefore, since Padmavajra and Kūkai were active in very distant regions at about the same time, it is not easy to imagine that the former had any ideological influence on the latter. |
| 目次 | 1.問題の所在 799 2.『大日経広釈』と『タントラ義入注釈』における用例の再検討 799 3.『如来心荘厳』における法身説法 797 4.結論 795 〈参考文献〉 794 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.2_799 |
| 點閱次數 | 84 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.11.04 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.11.06 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
