![]() |
|
| パーリ仏教文献における〈譬え〉の修辞学的考察=A Rhetorical Study of Parables in the Pali Nikāyas | ||
| 作者 | 塩田宝澍 (著)=Shiota, Hoju (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.71 n.1 (總號=n.158) |
| 出版日期 | 2022.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 467 - 464 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | Subodhālaṅkāra; 譬え; パーリ経典; 直喩; 例証法; 実例 |
| 摘要 | The analysis of three parables in the Satipattānasutta indicates that they fit the definition of upamā as defined in the Subodhālaṅkāra, but in function, it can be inferred that the three parables differ from the upamā as defined in the same text. In other words, the upamā in the text of the figure of speech is used to stimulate the aesthetic senses of the listener, and works directly to elicit aesthetic sensations, while the upamā in the Nikāyas has the function of helping the listener to understand the doctrines, a function closer to that of the dṛṣṭānta than the upamā in rhetorical texts. Thus, the upamā in rhetorical texts and the upamā in the Nikāyas are not the same, and the parables should not be analyzed as either upamā or dṛṣṭānta, but rather as being both upamā and dṛṣṭānta. |
| 目次 | 1.はじめに 467 2.直喩 ・ 例証法 ・ 実例の定義 467 3.『念処経』における〈譬え〉 466 4.結論 465 〈参考文献〉 464 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.1_467 |
| 點閱次數 | 95 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.10.12 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.10.16 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
