 |
|
| 唯識古学と唯識今学との異同：慧遠の『勝鬘経義記』と窺基の『勝鬘経述記』を中心にして=The Difference between Old and New Yogācāras: Focusing on Huiyuan’s Shengmanjing yiji 勝鬘経義記 and Kuiji’s Shengmanjing shuji 勝鬘経述記 | ||
| 作者 | 楊玉飛 (著)=Yang, Yu-fei (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.71 n.1 (總號=n.158) |
| 出版日期 | 2022.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 280 - 274 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 『勝鬘経』; 如来蔵; 空; 心 |
| 摘要 | Although Tathāgatagarbha thought and Consciousness-only thought belong to different lineages, there is certainly a close relationship between them in the history of Buddhist thought. Jingyingsi Huiyuan 浄影寺慧遠 and Kuiji 窺基 belong to the Dilun and the Faxiang School, respectively. They are the inheritors of the old Yogācāra and new Yogācāra thought. Since their commentaries on the Śrīmālādevīsiṃhanāda-sūtra ― Huiyuan’s Shengmanjing yiji 勝鬘経義記 and Kuiji’s Shengmanjing shuji 勝鬘経述記 ― are extant, we can systematically compare their interpretations of concepts such as tathāgatagarbha, mind-nature and śūnyatā. By comparing their commentaries, we will see how Chinese Buddhist thinkers started from their respective theoretical backgrounds and completed the digestion and absorption of tathāgatagarbha thought, while at the same time also clarifying the difference between the old and the new ideas of the Yogācāras. |
| 目次 | 1．問題の所在 280 2．如来蔵と空 280 3．如来蔵と心 278 4．まとめ 275 〈参考文献〉 274 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.1_280 |
| 點閱次數 | 211 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.10.02 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.10.04 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
