![]() |
|
| 子璿『楞厳経義疏注経』における中観思想と唯識思想について=Middle Way and Consciousness-Only Ideas in Zixuan’s Commentary on the Śūraṅgama-sūtra | ||
| 作者 | 田湖 (著)=TIAN Hu (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.71 n.1 (總號=n.158) |
| 出版日期 | 2022.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 246 - 242 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 長水子璿; 楞厳経義疏注経; 中観思想; 唯識思想 |
| 摘要 | From the end of the Tang Dynasty, the Śūraṅgama-sūtra was annotated by scholars of various Buddhist affiliations, and by non-Buddhist scholars. Because the commentaries have different academic backgrounds, their interpretations of the sūtra are different. Tiantai Buddhist scholars use Tiantai teachings to guide their interpretations, with the tendency of the Song period idea that “the six Confucian classics offer an interpretation of one’s own heart, and one’s heart includes all the things of the world 六経注我.” As a successor of the Huayan School, Zixuan interpreted the Śūraṅgama-sūtra as a way of “communicating with each other” under the guidance of Huayan teachings, adopting ideological elements including those of the “Middle Way” and “Consciousness-Only.” He interpreted the direction of the Middle Way thought in the Śūraṅgama-sūtra by using the ideas of the Madhyamaka-śāstra. In addition, he interpreted the direction of the Śūraṅgama-sūtra with the thought of the Triṃśikā and the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi. This fully shows his adoption of many excellent ideas and eclectic characteristics. |
| 目次 | 1.子璿の『楞厳経』解釈における「中観思想」の運用 246 1.1. 「四辺無生」によって,「浮塵幻相当生随滅」を論証する 246 1.2. 「無待無成」によって「有為無為如幻不実」を論証する 245 2.子璿の『楞厳経』の解釈における「唯識思想」の運用 245 2.1. 「精覚妙明」を「円成実性」によって解釈する 244 2.2. 唯識の「見道位」によって「円実心三昧」を解釈する 244 おわりに 242 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.1_246 |
| 點閱次數 | 210 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.10.02 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.10.03 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
