![]() |
|
| 法相唯識における『法華経』譬喩品の「衣裓几案」解釈=The Development of the Exegesis of the Lotus Sūtra in the Sino-Japanese Faxiang School 法相唯識: The Interpretations of “the garment and desk” 衣裓几案 in the Parable Chapter 譬喩品 | ||
| 作者 | 武本宗一郎 (著)=Takemoto, Soichiro (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.71 n.1 (總號=n.158) |
| 出版日期 | 2022.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 44 - 48 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 摘要 | Referring to Saichō’s 最澄 discussion, this paper traces the development of interpretations of “the garment and the desk” in the Sino-Japanese Faxiang 法相 school. In the parable of the burning house 火宅喩 in the Lotus Sūtra, there is a scene in which the affluent man ponders whether he should take his children out of the burning house by using his garment 衣裓 and desk 几案, before he prepares the three chariots 三車 for them. East Asian monks commenting on the Lotus Sūtra interpreted “the garment” and “the desk” in various ways. In particular, it is the interpretation of Kuiji 窺基, the founder of the Faxiang school, that has left interpretive challenges for later generations. He gave two different interpretations of “the garment and desk.” Chinese and Japanese monks of the Faxiang school have attempted to solve this problem and have generally developed two conclusions. |
| 目次 | 一 問題の所在 44 二 基の著述に見られる二種の「衣裓几案」解釈 44 三 日本法相宗における「衣裓几案」解釈 45 四 小結 47 〈参考文献〉 48 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.1_44 |
| 點閱次數 | 103 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.09.09 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.09.11 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
