 |
|
| 갈등과 분쟁을 해결하기 위한 종교적 방안에 관한 고찰 - 불교의 역사적 사례를 중심으로 -=A Study on Religious Options for Resolving Conflicts and Conflicts - Focusing on the Historical Cases of Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | 김생식 (著)=Kim, Sengsik (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Arbitration Studies=한국중재학회지:중재연구 |
| 卷期 | v.32 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2022 |
| 頁次 | 143 - 164 |
| 出版者 | Korean Association for Arbitration Studies |
| 出版者網址 | https://koreascience.kr/journal/GJJHAA.page |
| 出版地 | Daejeon, Korea [大田廣域市, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 附註項 | Author Affiliation: Joong-Ang Sangha University Graduate School, Arbitrator. |
| 關鍵詞 | 분쟁=Dispute; 대체적 분쟁해결=ADR(Altemative Distribute Resolution); 불교적 분쟁해결=BDR(Buddhist Dispute Resolution); 분쟁해결=Distribute Resolution; 종교=Religion |
| 摘要 | It is not an exaggeration to say that our society is already one of disputes. Since circa 2010, the average number of lawsuits filed every year is upwards of six million cases, and resolving disputes through trials is already fully saturated. The functional roles of the court reflect that there are many lacking areas such as systems, tools, and procedures related to social integration. In addition, ADR, which is carried out in advanced capitalist nations to supplement the judicial functions, has also been implemented in our society for the past 60 years. However, for the reason why the usage rate of ADR did not increase for legal consumers, we cannot overlook government activities that did not make sufficient promotions related to the lack of awareness. In Korea, ADR is mainly composed ofgovernment-initiated types, and in particular, there is no ADR framework act that can play an integrated role. Furthermore, for the conciliation system of the court, over 80% of conciliation are conducted focusing on court of lawsuits, and legal basis and procedures between institutes are different for administrative ADR, and communication does not go smoothly, thus making it inefficient. Such examples cannot avoid being a background forcriticism when considering the fundamental ideologies and beliefs of ADR. The Vinaya Pitaka of sangha related to ADR is a separate method for operating communities. This is the BDR (Buddhist Dispute Resolution) method that encompasses personal ethics, organizational ethics, harmony through various community gatherings, and adhikaranasamatha on the four issues that could occur in legal review procedures. This has become the sufficient background for succession and development for parisa sangha and gana sangha among individuals. |
| 目次 | Ⅰ. 서론 144 II. 불교적 분쟁해결의 이념 145 1. BDR의 이념 및 목표 145 (1) BDR의 이념 145 1) 평화 145 2) 비폭력 146 3) 자비심(慈悲心) 147 4) 한마음(一心) 148 5) 소결 148 II. 불교적 분쟁해결의 역사적 사례분석 149 1. 초기불교의 분쟁해결 사례 149 (1) 석가족과 꼴리야족의 분쟁해결 149 (2) 밧지족의 분쟁 150 (3) 꼬삼비 승가의 분쟁해결 150 2. 부파불교의 분쟁해결 사례 151 (1) 십사의 분쟁 발생 151 (2) 십사의 판정과 부파 분열 152 3. 대승불교의 분쟁해결 사례 153 (1) 선교 및 유불선의 분쟁과 서산대사 153 (2) 티베트불교의 삼예의 논쟁 155 (3) 중국 삼무일종의 난과 분쟁해결 156 4. 근대 한국불교의 분쟁해결 사례 158 (1) 불교정화운동과 분쟁해결 158 (2) 10.27 법난 159 (3) 종권 다툼과 분쟁해결 160 IV. 결론 161 참고문헌 162 Abstract 164 |
| ISSN | 12263699 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 119 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.08.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.08.23 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
