![]() |
|
| Tibetan Reform and the Kalmyk Revival of Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | Sinclair, Tara (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Inner Asia |
| 卷期 | v.10 n.2 Special Issue |
| 出版日期 | 2008.01 |
| 頁次 | 241 - 259 |
| 出版者 | Brill |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.brill.nl/ |
| 出版地 | Leiden, the Netherlands [萊登, 荷蘭] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Author Affiliation: Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit, Cambridge, UK |
| 關鍵詞 | Kalmykia; Buddhism; Russia; Revival; Reform |
| 摘要 | The anti-religious campaigns of the Soviet Union in the 1930s eradicated Kalmyk Buddhism from the public sphere. Following perestroika the Kalmyks retain a sense of being an essentially Buddhist people. Accordingly, the new Kalmyk government is reviving the religion with the building of temples and the attempted training of Kalmyk monks, yet monasticism is proving too alien for young post-soviets. According to traditional Kalmyk Gelug Buddhism authoritative Buddhist teachers must be monks, so monastic Tibetans from India have been invited to the republic to help revive Buddhism. The subsequent labelling by these monks of 'surviving' Kalmyk Buddhist practices as superstitious, mistaken or corrupt is an initial step in the purification of alternate views, leading to religious reform. This appraisal of historical practices is encouraged by younger Kalmyks who do not find sense in surviving Buddhism but are enthused with the philosophical approach taught by visiting Buddhist teachers at Dharma centres. By discussing this post-Soviet shift in local notions of religious efficacy, I show how the social movements of both reform and revival arise as collusion between contemporary Tibetan and Kalmyk views on the nature of true Buddhism. |
| ISSN | 14648172 (P); 22105018 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1163/000000008793066713 |
| 點閱次數 | 1 |
| 建檔日期 | 2024.06.13 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.06.25 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
