 |
|
| 요가난다의 크리야 요가에 대한 일고찰 : 고전 요가와 대비를 중심으로=Study on Yogananda’s Kriya Yoga: forcusing on Classical Yoga | ||
| 作者 | 김재민 (著)=Kim, Jae-min (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 인도철학=印度哲學=Korean Journal of Indian Philosophy |
| 卷期 | n.30 |
| 出版日期 | 2010 |
| 頁次 | 191 - 218 |
| 出版者 | 印度哲學會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://krindology.com/ |
| 出版地 | Korea [韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 附註項 | 저자정보: 동국대(서울) 불교학부 강사. |
| 關鍵詞 | 세계 전개; 정신․생리; 호흡 수행; 유가=yuga; 점성학; 점성학; 소우주; prANa; hatha yoga; yogananda; kriya yoga |
| 摘要 | 20세기에 가장 널리 알려진 요가 수행자들 중 한 명인 요가난다의 요가는 고전 요가에도 나오는 크리야 요가다. 그는 양자가 동일하거나 비슷하다고 언급했지만 분명한 차이를 보인다. 무엇보다 요가난다 요가가 해탈을 위한 완결 체계인 반면, Ys 크리야 요가는 마음이 동요하는 초심자를 위한 요가이자 본격적 수행을 위한 삼매를 촉진하는 보조적 요가라는 점이다. 또 요가난다 수행 체계는 에너지 흐름 통제를 통한 브라만과의 합일이 목표인 반면, Ys는 명상으로 마음 작용을 억제하여 순수 정신(푸루샤)이 독존하게, 즉 근본 원질(프라크리티)과 분리되게 하는 것이 최종 목표다. 따라서 그의 주장과 달리 양자는 동일성보다는 차이성이 훨씬 더 크다. 그럼에도 불구하고 요가난다가 그와 같이 주장한 이유는 후대 요가들이 일반적으로 선대의 권위 있는 문헌들에 의존해서 자신들의 정통성을 세우고자 하는 기조와 그 맥을 같이 한다. Yogananda is one of the best well-known yogis in 20th C.E. He called his yoga system as Kriya Yoga. This system is also appeared in Ys. He said both are same or similiar, therefore it is meaningful what are analogues and what are distinctions comparing Yogananda’s Kriya Yoga with that of Ys. It helps to know the view of Modern yoga related to Classical yoga. People or groups who practice Yogananda Yoga have not revealed most of their theory and practice system to outside, so it is hard to know it’s details and understand it’s system. Thus I search it’s theory and practice method based on 「The Science of Kriya Yoga」 in ABY. Because he said it containes best explanation about his yoga. In case of Classical Yoga, I use Ys and YBh mainly, and Tv secondly. It is as follows that differences between Yogananda Yoga and Ys’ Kriya Yoga is. The former is completed system for liberation, while the latter is for beginners whose minds are disturbed and is subsystem for accelerating samādhi. Also in metaphysics, both have serious differences. Fundamentally, the former is theistic monism, whereas the latter is atheistic dualism. In the theory of evolution, both have more differences than similarities. In the view of human body, Yogananda sees it as microcosm with energy and magnetic field, while Ys takes it focusing on citta as mass of tattvas of evolution of Prakṛti. Therefore it is resonable for both to show differences in the details of practice system. In conclusion, the aim of Yogananda’s practicing system is union with Brāhman through control of prāṇa, while that of Ys is kaivalya of Prūṣa separated from Prakṛti. Yogananda uses same terminology, Kriya Yoga, with Ys, and proclaim that his yoga system is same or similar to Kriya Yoga of Ys. But both have much differences than samenesses or similarities. The reason why Yogananda persists relations his yoga system with practice system of Ys is that he intends to establish his legitimacy, leaning on authority of previous literatures. This kind of stream is in common in the Post Classical Yoga. |
| 目次 | I 서론. 191 II 본론. 195 III 결론. 213 |
| ISSN | 12263230 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 79 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.09.30 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.09.30 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
