1. Special Issue: The Cambodian People’s Party’s Turn to Hegemonic Authoritarianism: Strategies and Envisaged Futures
2. Sokphea Young is Postdoctoral Researcher at University College London, UK. Postal Address: 14 Taviton Street, London, WC1H 0BW, UK
關鍵詞
Labour movements; democratization; unions; opposition alliance; Cambodia
摘要
It is postulated that collective labour movements responding to demands for political reform, rather than to workplace demands, are key actors in democratic mobilization. Contrary to this proposition, this article draws on evidence from labour movements and related social allies in Cambodia to examine why they fail to mobilize in support of democratic revolutions. This article argues that labour movements in Cambodia do not “burst onto the political scene” because they possess weak social and institutional alliances with political actors, such as opposition parties and other interest groups, to establish a democratic revolution. The capacity of labour movements to transform “democratic intent” into “democratic action” is thus hindered by the ability of authoritarian rulers and their coalitions, including business elites, to tightly control and co-opt alliances of labour movements designed to put pressure on the ruling regime. In essence, capitalist development does not strengthen the capacity of excluded labour groups but co-opts them to break down the opposition alliance and thus prevent democratization.
目次
Abstract 345 Keywords 345 The Limitations of the Contingency Argument 348 The Origin and De-politicization of Labour Politics in Cambodia 350 The Lack of Societal Allies: Diversity without Solidarity 355 The Lack of Business and Elite Allies 360 Conclusion 363 NOTES 364
