![]() |
|
| Husserl’s Epoché and Sarkar’s Pratyáhára: Transcendence, Ipseity, and Praxis | ||
| 作者 | Hewitson, Justin M. (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Comparative and Continental Philosophy |
| 卷期 | v.6 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2014 |
| 頁次 | 158 - 177 |
| 出版者 | Taylor & Francis |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.tandfonline.com/ |
| 出版地 | London, England, UK [倫敦, 英格蘭, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Author Affiliation: National Taiwan University & Southern University of Science and Technology, Taiwan. |
| 關鍵詞 | Edmund Husserl; P. R. Sarkar; Martin Heidegger; Tantra; Buddhism; India; phenomenology; ipseity; transcendental ego; epoché; pratyáhára; reduction; shuddhis; consciousness; praxis; meditation; meta-ipseity |
| 摘要 | This article proposes an evolution of Edmund Husserl’s transcendental epoché (reduction) by integrating P. R. Sarkar’s Tantra sádhaná (meditation), which engages ipseity as both the subject and the object of consciousness. First, it explores some of the recent philosophical and scientific obstacles that confound the transcendental reduction. Following this, an East-West trajectory for Husserl’s first science of consciousness is examined by combining Sarkar’s 3 shuddhis (reductive concentrations) in pratyáhára (mental withdrawal), effecting an experience of noumenal consciousness. Combining Husserl’s phenomenology with Sarkar’s spiritual praxis reinvigorates the transcendental epoché and emphasizes practice in a field both undermined by logical positivism and dominated by the scholasticism of Husserl’s protégés. Furthermore, the efficacy of an East-West approach is contextualized in view of Husserl’s admiration of Buddhism and Sarkar’s cognitive cosmology. |
| ISSN | 17570638 (P); 17570646 (E) |
| DOI | 10.1179/1757063814Z.00000000039 |
| 點閱次數 | 52 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.09.20 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.09.20 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
