 |
|
| 중도(中道)에 근거한 『법화경(法華經)』의 몇 가지 해석(解析)=Analysis of some terms in Lotus Sutra via The Middle Path | ||
| 作者 | 이병수 (著)=Lee, Byung-soo (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 동아시아불교문화=Journal of Eastern-Asia Buddhism and Culture |
| 卷期 | v.11 n.0 |
| 出版日期 | 2012.09 |
| 頁次 | 97 - 125 |
| 出版者 | 동아시아불교문화학회=The Association of Eastern-Asia Buddhism and Culture |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.easternasia.kr/ |
| 出版地 | Busan, Korea [釜山, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 附註項 | 저자정보: 경성대 |
| 關鍵詞 | 非有想非無想=fei-you-xiang-fei-wu-xiang; 人非人=ren-fei-ren; 學無學=xue-wu-xue; 중도=The Middle Path; 퍼지 논리; Fuzzy proposition; Fuzzy set |
| 摘要 | 佛性은 萬物의 근본이고 삶의 본질이다. 唯識은 만물의 지속적인 흐름이며 生滅은 논리 以前의 것으로 논리를 超越한 것이다. 우리의 삶과 마음이 퍼지(fuzzy)인 것처럼 佛法 또한 퍼지 논리적(fuzzy logic)이고 불법의 가르침 또한 퍼지 논리적이다. 緣起에 바탕을 둔 中道는 兩極端의 一次結合(linear combination)의 형태로 나타나며 因緣에 따라 兩極端을 포함하기도 한다. 이 논문에서는 『法華經』에 나타나는 ``人非人``과 ``學無學`` 및 ``非有想非無想``의 세 用語의 실질적 의미를 中道에 근거하여 퍼지 논리적 입장에서 解釋하고자 한다. A fuzzy set is an infinite set with fuzzy concept and a fuzzy logic is an infinite-valued logic with fuzzy concept. Our mind and our lives are fuzzy which implies that Buddha`s nature, which is the unique truth, is also fuzzy. Since Buddha`s nature is the truth of universe, it precedes the logic, so Birth-Death transcends also the logic. Fuzzy set and fuzzy logic can be used to represent the infinite grades of understanding of Buddha`s nature. Buddha`s Law and it`s teaching are also fuzzy-logic, which coincides with the fact that our lives and minds are based on fuzzy logic. It seems that the real meanings of ren-fei-ren(人非人), xue-wuxue(學無學) and fei-you-xiang-fei-wu-xiang(非有想非無想) in Lotus Sutra have been wrongly or differently translated by Chinese Zhiyi (智意), Jizang(吉藏), Kuiji(窺基), Jiehuan(戒環) and others, with some Koreans for a long time. In this paper, we tried to show the real meanings of vren-fei-ren (人非人), xue-wu-xue(學無學) and fei-you- xiang-fei-wu-xiang(非有想非無想) in Lotus Sutraia via The Middle Path, we concluded that 1) ``ren-fei-ren(人非人)`` is a union of ren(人) and fei-ren(非人) containing ren(人) and fei-ren(非人) as both extremes, 2) ``xue-wu-xue(學無學)`` is a union of xue(學) and wu-xue(無學) containing xue(學) and wu-xue(無學) as both extremes, and 3) ``fei-you-xiang-fei-wu-xiang(非有想非無想)`` is a union of ``fei-you-xiang(非有想)`` and ``fei-wu-xiang(非無想)`` containing ``feiyou- xiang(非有想)`` and ``fei-wu-xiang(非無想)`` as both extremes. |
| 目次 | I. 서 론 97 II. 붓다의 가르침에 대한 誤解와 無智 100 III. 中 道 103 IV. 人非人의 의미 107 V. ‘學無學人’의 의미 113 VI. 非有想非無想의 의미 115 VII. 結 論 120 |
| ISSN | 27140938 (P); 27140946 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 66 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.08.15 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.08.15 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
