 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mindsets and Commentarial Conventions Among Indian Buddhists |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
Nance, Richard F. (著)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.83 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2015.03 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 210 - 235 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Oxford University Press |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Oxford, UK [牛津, 英國] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 摘要 | This article is in five sections. After a brief introduction, I examine Johannes Bronkhorst's hypothesis that postulation of a commentarial "mindset" may help to account for the persistence of errors that occur in medieval Indian root texts and in commentaries on those texts. Although aspects of Bronkhorst's account are tenable, I argue that its overall conclusion is unhelpful and should be reassessed in light of the data provided in Buddhist commentaries and commentarial guides. In the article's third and fourth sections, I explore two instances of commentary that call into question the explanatory power of the commentarial mindset as sketched by Bronkhorst. The fifth section of the article suggests some previously overlooked resources for recovery of the conventions that governed the composition of commentaries among Indian Buddhists. |
|---|
| 目次 | Abstract 210
Setting The Stage
Two Further Passages Drawn from Buddhist Commentaries 219
The Aksayamatinirdesasutratikā 219
The Vimalaprabhā 223
Addressing The Implications of These Passages 226
Exemplifying Commentary: The Vyākhyāyukti 227
References 233 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00027189 (P); 14774585 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfu109 |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 85 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2023.08.10 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.08.10 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
