 |
|
| The Relationship between the Cīvaravastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya and Chapter 36 of Yijing’s Nanhai jigui neifa zhuan: A Re-examination | ||
| 作者 | Wu, Juan (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Indo-Iranian Journal |
| 卷期 | v.65 n.1 |
| 出版日期 | 2022.03 |
| 頁次 | 32 - 84 |
| 出版者 | Brill |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.brill.com/ |
| 出版地 | Leiden, the Netherlands [萊登, 荷蘭] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Author Affiliation: Tsinghua University China Beijing |
| 關鍵詞 | Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya; Cīvaravastu; Vinayasaṃgraha; Yijing; Nanhai jigui neifa zhuan; Buddhist monastic inheritance law |
| 摘要 | This paper reconsiders the long-held view that Chapter 36 of the Nanhai jigui neifa zhuan or “Record of the Inner Law Sent Home from the South Seas” written by the Chinese pilgrim Yijing is a translation of a long passage from the Cīvaravastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya. Through comparing Chapter 36 with the Gilgit Sanskrit text of the Cīvaravastu, the Tibetan translation of the Cīvaravastu, and Yijing’s translation of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinayasaṃgraha, this paper reveals, on the one hand, significant differences between Chapter 36 and the extant versions of the Cīvaravastu, and, on the other hand, substantial overlap between Chapter 36 and Yijing’s translation of the Vinayasaṃgraha. It argues that Chapter 36 was not translated from the Cīvaravastu (or at least not from a version of the Cīvaravastu identical with or similar to the Gilgit Sanskrit version), but rather seems to have been composed by Yijing through drawing largely (though not entirely) from the Vinayasaṃgraha. This paper therefore demonstrates anew that Yijing’s travel record cannot be simply taken as his eyewitness report of Buddhist monastic practices in ancient India. |
| ISSN | 00197246 (P); 15728536 (E) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15728536-06501003 |
| 點閱次數 | 176 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.07.13 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.07.13 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
