 |
|
| Theravada Buddhism and Roman Catholicism on the Moral Permissibility of Palliative Sedation: A Blurred Demarcation Line | ||
| 作者 | Ara Islam, Asmat (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Religion & Health |
| 卷期 | v.61 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2022.04 |
| 頁次 | 1405 - 1417 |
| 出版者 | Springer Science & Business Media B.V. |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.springer.com/gp/ |
| 出版地 | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Palliative sedation; Catholic bioethics; Buddhist bioethics; Principle of double efect; Ahiṃsā |
| 摘要 | Although Theravada Buddhism and Roman Catholicism agree on the moral justification for palliative sedation, they differ on the premises underlying the justification. While Catholicism justifies palliative sedation on the ground of the Principle of Double Effect, Buddhism does so on the basis of the Third Noble Truth. Despite their theological differences, Buddhism and Catholicism both value the moral significance of the physician’s intent to reduce suffering and both respect the sanctity of life. This blurs the demarcation line between Buddhism and Catholicism regarding the moral justification of palliative sedation. |
| 目次 | Abstract 1405 Introduction 1405 Background 1406 Common Aim Between Nirvāṇa and Palliative Sedation 1409 Common Ground between Buddhism and Catholicism: Sanctity of Life 1410 Intention in the Principle of Double Efect, Ahiṃsā, and Palliative Sedation 1412 Research Limitations 1414 Conclusion 1415 References 1416 |
| ISSN | 00224197 (P); 15736571 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01464-7 |
| 點閱次數 | 108 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.07.07 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.08.02 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
