![]() |
|
| Being A 'Not-Quite-Buddhist Theist' | ||
| 作者 | Rooney, James Dominic (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Religious Studies |
| 卷期 | v.58 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2022.12 |
| 頁次 | 787 - 800 |
| 出版者 | Cambridge University Press |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.cambridge.org/ |
| 出版地 | Cambridge, UK [劍橋, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Huayan; God; causality; pantheism; Buddhism |
| 摘要 | Buddhism is a tradition that set itself decidedly against theism, with the development of complex arguments against the existence of God. I propose that the metaphysical conclusions reached by some schools in the Mahayana tradition present a vision of reality that, with some apparently small modification, would ground an argument for the existence of God. This argument involves explanation in terms of natures rather than causal agency. Yet I conclude not only that the Buddhist becomes a theist in embracing such explanations as legitimate, but also ipso facto abandons their metaphysical project and ceases to be a Buddhist. |
| 目次 | Abstract 787 The Buddhist Analysis of Causality 788 Huayan and Inter-Dependence 790 A Concluding Meta-Metaphysical Postscript 796 Footnotes 799 References 800 |
| ISSN | 00344125 (P); 1469901X (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412521000391 |
| 點閱次數 | 1 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.06.19 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.08.10 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
