 |
|
| Vimalasaratissa's Sasanavamsadipa on the Dispute about the Monastic Boundary (sima) of Balapitiya | ||
| 作者 | Kieffer-Pülz, Petra (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 創価大学国際仏教学高等研究所年報=Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University=ソウカ ダイガク コクサイ ブッキョウガク コウトウ ケンキュウジョ ネンポウ |
| 卷期 | v.26 |
| 出版日期 | 2023 |
| 頁次 | 77 - 96 |
| 出版者 | 創価大学・国際仏教学高等研究所 |
| 出版者網址 | http://iriab.soka.ac.jp/publication/ |
| 出版地 | 八王子, 日本 [Hachioji, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Aṁbagahapiṭiyē/Välitarē/Välitoṭē Vimalasāratissa; Asaṅkaravādins; confusionists; non-confusionists; Saṅkaravādins; Sāsanavaṃsadīpa; sīmā of Balapiṭiya; udakukkhepasīmā |
| 摘要 | Two factions were involved in the dispute about the legal validity of the monastic boundary (sīmā) of Balapiṭiya in 19th c. Sri Lanka: the confusionists (saṅkaravādin) and the nonconfusionists (asaṅkaravādin). The first group considered the Balapiṭiya sīmā, a ‘watersplashing boundary’ (udakukkhepasīmā), legally invalid, because there was a confusion between it and the adjacent ‘village boundary’; the second group did not accept this, and considered the Balapiṭiya sīmā legally valid. In his Sāsanavaṃsadīpo, written in 1879 and published in 1880, Aṁbagahapiṭyē Vimalasāratissa, a representative of the non-confusionists (asaṅkaravādin), also briefly discusses this chapter of the history of Buddhism on the island. In keeping with the work as a whole, he does not discuss in detail these events that occurred during his lifetime. Nevertheless, these stanzas reveal quite a bit. In the present article I give the relevant section of the Sāsanavaṃsadīpa (stanzas 1604–1659) together with an English translation, and a discussion of its contents. |
| 目次 | Introduction 77 Text and Translation of stanzas 1604–1659 79 Conclusion 94 |
| ISSN | 13438980 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 359 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.06.18 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.07.10 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
