![]() |
|
| The Deconstruction of Dafther Jailani: Muslim and Buddhist Contests of Original History in Sri Lanka | ||
| 作者 | McKinley, Alexander (著) ; Xavier, Merin Shobhana (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | History of Religions |
| 卷期 | v.62 n.3 |
| 出版日期 | 2023.02 |
| 頁次 | 254 - 283 |
| 出版者 | University of Chicago Press |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.press.uchicago.edu/index.html |
| 出版地 | Chicago, IL, US [芝加哥, 伊利諾伊州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Alexander McKinley, Loyola University Chicago. Merin Shobhana Xavier, Queen’s University. |
| 摘要 | Although quests for religious origins have been theoretically deconstructed by scholars, discourse about religion in much of the public sphere remains enamored with originality, especially to bolster claims among groups competing over shared spaces. At the Sri Lankan Sufi shrine of Dafther Jailani in Kuragala, an obsession with origins has dramatically reorganized the space, used to justify the physical deconstruction of Muslim pilgrim buildings by the Sri Lankan military. Dafther Jailani also faces other threats from arbiters of originality, including orthodox Sunni Muslims who claim to be stewards of authentic Islam, alongside the Buddhist nationalists who seek to make Kuragala a protected archeological site synonymous with non-Muslim space. Both Buddhists and Muslims have mixed mythical narratives and empirical evidence to advance their claims, and even artifacts from human prehistory at Kuragala are appropriated to provide a new secular excuse for extremist Buddhists to enact an absence of Muslims. Such debates over origins are shown to be a zero-sum game, as one group must lose for another to gain. Yet these gains are ultimately hollow, as mutually valued spaces are emptied of living history to better resemble an ideal past. To combat such erasures, historians of religion must strike a balance between the empirical and ethical, critiquing not only factual errors in these arguments, but also correct information being used incorrectly, to argue in the normative terms of the religious actors themselves that there is much lost and little gained in primordial preoccupations. |
| 目次 | Abstract Muslim Myths and Contested Claims 258 Sufism and Anti-Sufism in Struggles over Dafther Jailani 262 The Brahmi Controversy: What a Difference an Inscription Makes 266 The Infelicities of New Buddhist History 272 Appropriating Prehistory 277 Conclusion 281 Notes |
| ISSN | 00182710 (P); 15456935 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1086/723307 |
| 點閱次數 | 127 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.06.17 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.06.17 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
