![]() |
|
| Are Ethnocentric/Nationalist Buddhists Engaged Buddhists? Certainly Not. | ||
| 作者 | King, Sallie B. (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Buddhist Ethics |
| 卷期 | v.30 |
| 出版日期 | 2023 |
| 頁次 | 83 - 92 |
| 出版者 | Department of History & Religious Studies Program , The Pennsylvania State University |
| 出版者網址 | https://history.la.psu.edu/ |
| 出版地 | University Park, PA, US |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | ahimsa; engaged Buddhism; human rights; Myanmar; Sri Lanka |
| 摘要 | This is a brief response to Donna Lynn Brown’s article, “Beyond Queen and King: Democratizing ‘Engaged Buddhism’,” (Journal of Buddhist Ethics Vol. 30, 2023) and indirectly to others who have argued that ethnocentric and/or nationalist Buddhism could be a part of Engaged Buddhism. To this question, I will argue that this is not possible. Secondarily, I take up the question of the “oneness” of Engaged Buddhism. |
| 目次 | Abstract 83 Works Cited 91 |
| ISSN | 10769005 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 283 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.05.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.05.29 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
