![]() |
|
| 再論吐蕃與景教、摩尼教的聯系=Re-Examining Tibet's Connections with Nestorianism and Manicheism | ||
| 作者 | 沈琛 (著)=Shen, Chen (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research |
| 卷期 | n.3 (總號=n.193) |
| 出版日期 | 2022 |
| 頁次 | 139 - 147 |
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.dha.ac.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者單位:南開大學歷史學院 |
| 關鍵詞 | 吐蕃=Tibet; 景教=Nestorianism; 摩尼教=Manichaeism; 劍南禪宗=Chan in Jiannan |
| 摘要 | 本文對有關吐蕃與景教、摩尼教聯系的5組史料的性質、年代與真偽進行了重新檢視,以此探討景教、摩尼教在吐蕃的傳播路徑與范圍,并著重對學界所提出的摩尼教相關知識自劍南道傳入吐蕃之說進行了辨析。景教與摩尼教的傳播主要發生在吐蕃新占領的敦煌,西境拉達克一帶的景教和摩尼教色彩粟特語題記屬于麝香之路上的粟特商人或者使者。有關摩尼教與景教的知識可能正是從敦煌和拉達克兩條路經傳入吐蕃宮廷。這兩種宗教也未能在吐蕃腹地獲得實質性的傳播。 By reexamining the nature, date, and authenticity of five groups of materials associated with Nestorianism and Manichaeism in Tibet, this paper discusses the paths and scope of their dissemination and analyzes the historical view that knowledge of Nestorianism was spread into Tibet through Jiannandao, a former Ba and Shu prefecture in Sichuan near modern-day Chengdu. The dissemination of these two religions mainly took place in Dunhuang just after the region was occupied by the Tibetans. Some of the most important evidence for the presence and propagation of both Nestorianism and Manichaeism are texts written in the Tibetan Ladakhi language left by Sogdian merchants or envoys on the “Musk Road” trading route. The two religions likely spread into the Tibetan court via Dunhuang and Ladakh, but they never reached central Tibet. |
| 目次 | 一提摩太一世的兩封敘利亞語書信 二敦煌藏文P.t.351《占卜書》 三拉達克的粟特文景教十字架 四敦煌藏文文書P.t.1182與P.t.1676上所繪的十字架 五赤松德贊所撰《正語量略集》 結論 |
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
| DOI | 10.13584/j.cnki.issn1000-4106.2022.03.014 |
| 點閱次數 | 101 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.04.07 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.04.07 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
