![]() |
|
| 河西早期石窟年代的甄別 - 河西早期石窟研究之上=Determining the Dates of Early Grottoes in Hexi - A Study on the Early Grottoes of Hexi and Related Issues (I) | ||
| 作者 | 韋正 (著)=Wei, Zheng (au.) ; 馬銘悅 (著)=Ma, Ming-yue (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research |
| 卷期 | n.1 (總號=n.191) |
| 出版日期 | 2022 |
| 頁次 | 63 - 71 |
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.dha.ac.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 北京大學考古文博學院 |
| 關鍵詞 | 河西早期石窟=early Hexi Grottoes; 年代=age; 十六國晚期=late Sixteen Kingdoms period |
| 摘要 | 河西早期石窟中,武威天梯山之外的石窟年代都有分歧。經過辨證,酒泉文殊山石窟前山千佛洞、張掖馬蹄寺石窟千佛洞第1窟和第4窟、金塔寺石窟東西窟的年代,與武威天梯山石窟第1、4窟相近,上限都可到十六國晚期,下限難以進入北魏;敦煌莫高窟第275窟年代難以上升到十六國晚期,而應開鑿于北魏早期。 Besides the Tiantishan Grottoes in Wuwei, the construction dates of the early grottoes of the Hexi region all remain disputable. Both textual and visual research suggests that the dates of Qianfo Cave at the Wenshushan Grottoes in Jiuquan, caves 1 and 4 of the Matisi Grottoes, and the East and West Caves of the Jintasi Grottoes in Zhangye are close to that of caves 1 and 4 of the Tiantishan Grottoes in Wuwei, which were made as early as the Sixteen Kingdoms period and no later than the Northern dynasty. Mogao cave 275 at Dunhuang was probably created no earlier than the Sixteen Kingdoms period and was most likely constructed during the early Northern Wei dynasty. |
| 目次 | 一問題的提出和年代甄別的出發點 1.問題的提出 2.天梯山石窟是年代甄別的出發點 二河西早期石窟年代的甄別 1.酒泉文殊山石窟年代的甄別 2.張掖馬蹄寺石窟年代的甄別 3.金塔寺石窟年代的甄別 4.敦煌莫高窟第275窟年代的甄別 |
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
| DOI | 10.13584/j.cnki.issn1000-4106.2022.01.005 |
| 點閱次數 | 149 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.03.20 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.03.20 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
