![]() |
|
| 중국 근대 ‘진화’관념의 불교적 대응=Buddhism's Critical Reaction to "Evolution" in Modern China | ||
| 作者 | 김영진 (著)=Kim, Young-jin (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 보조사상=普照思想=Journal of Bojo Jinul's Thought |
| 卷期 | v.23 n.0 |
| 出版日期 | 2005 |
| 頁次 | 293 - 334 |
| 出版者 | 普照思想研究院 |
| 出版地 | Korea [韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 附註項 | 저자정보: 동국대 박사과정 |
| 關鍵詞 | 진화론=evolution; Taixu; 장태염=Zang Taiyan; 태허법사; 양계초; 중국근대=modern China; 불교개혁; buddhism; Imperialism |
| 摘要 | Evolutionary theory has some significant meanings in modern China. First of all, it made people believe history's progress. History's progress was hope of Chinese intellectuals. So, the theory of evolution was given enthusiastic welcomes from the intellectuals. Another function of evolutionary theory was Imperialism's herald. It spreaded "the law of the jungle" and "the survival of the fittest." The invasion of the west powers depended its theoretical background on evolutionary theory. Science has no idea of morality. Moralistic criticism against the Western Imperialism was fundamentally impossible. Most of modern Chinese intellectuals accepted evolutionary theory without any critical thinking. However there were some remarkable Chinese scholars against evolutionary theory. Through mediating Buddhism, Zang Taiyan and Taixu criticized evolutionary theory. Evolutionary theory promotes self-consciousness. It enlarges and strengthens the self-consciousness of the individual through competition. Eventually, the connection between the individuals would be ruptured. Therefore, for protecting the fact that the human being is "pratityasamutpā," Buddhists fought against evolutionary theory. |
| 目次 | I. 머리말 3 II. 진화관년의 유입과 사유의 동유 6 III. 章太炎의 이중진화론과 문명론 17 IV. 불교의 평등관념과 진화론의 상충 25 V. 맺음말 36 |
| ISSN | 12297968 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 97 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.02.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.02.26 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
