 |
|
| 非認識因における知覚可能性の再考=A Re-Examination of Imperceptibility in the Case of anupalabdhi | ||
| 作者 | 繆寿楽 (著)=Miao, Shou-le (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.70 n.2 (總號=n.156) |
| 出版日期 | 2022.03.23 |
| 頁次 | 919 - 916 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 非認識; 知覚可能性; ダルモーッタラ; 付託 |
| 摘要 | Dharmakīrti’s third logical reason holds that non-cognition （anupalabdhi） can establish the absence of an object under the condition that the object in question is perceptible （dṛśya）. In the analysis by Dharmottara, the perceptibility （dṛśyatva） of the object is identified as the presence of both the object itself and all the other causal factors, e.g., light. However, how can we determine the perceptibility of an object when the object itself is absent? According to Watanabe 2001, Dharmottara holds that it is by means of superimposition （samāropa） that one can comprehend the perceptibility of an object whether it is naturally perceptible or imperceptible, such as a pot or a piśāca-demon, respectively. In other words, Watanabe assumes that there is only one pattern of setting the perceptibility of objects in Dharmottara’s system, i.e., superimposition; however, this is not the case. This paper shows that Dharmottara exhibits at least three patterns when dealing with different objects: 1） Objects that are generally perceptible, e.g., pots; 2） Objects that are generally imperceptible, e.g., piśāca-demons; 3） Objects that are generally perceptible but become imperceptible in a specific situation, e.g., fire in a room being imperceptible from the outside. |
| 目次 | 1．問題の所在 919 2．付託の基本構造 919 3．三種の否定対象 919 3.1. 知覚可能なもの 918 3.2. 自性の点で知覚不可能なもの 918 3.3. 場所の点で知覚不可能なもの 917 4．結論 916 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.2_919 |
| 點閱次數 | 160 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.01.10 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.01.10 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
