![]() |
|
| Subodhālaṅkāraにおける言葉の修辞と意味の修辞=Saddālaṅkāra and Atthālaṅkāra in the Subodhālaṅkāra | ||
| 作者 | 塩田宝澍 (著)=Shiota, Hoju (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.70 n.1 (總號=n.155) |
| 出版日期 | 2021.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 500 - 497 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | Subodhālaṅkāra; 言葉の修辞; 意味の修辞; 附託; 隠喩 |
| 摘要 | The Indian science of rhetoric (alaṅkāra) systematizes figures of speech. While a large number of classical works on Sanskrit rhetoric have been handed down to us, Pāli rhetoric has only one extant treatise: the Subodhālaṅkāra, written by Saṅgharakkhita. This paper discusses how verbal figures of speech (saddālaṅkāra) and semantic figures of speech (atthālaṅkāra) are defined and related to each other in the Subodhālaṅkāra, with a special focus on the relationship between superimposition (samādhi) and metaphor (rūpaka). This paper concludes with the following two points. First, in the Subodhālaṅkāra, we can infer that saddālaṅkāra refers to merit (guṇa) and atthālaṅkāra refers to figures of speech. Second, the two alaṅkāras affect each other as in the case of samādhi and rūpaka. Furthermore, saddālaṅkāra and atthālaṅkāra have a point of contact, so it is possible to assume a relationship in which saddālaṅkāra is established by atthālaṅkāra or its effect is increased by atthālaṅkāra, rather than a relationship in which atthālaṅkāra is established by saddālaṅkāra, as pointed out in previous studies. |
| 目次 | 1.はじめに 500 2.言葉の修辞と意味の修辞 500 3.附託と隠喩 499 4.結論 498 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.1_500 |
| 點閱次數 | 66 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.01.06 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.01.06 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
