 |
|
| 虎関師錬の修証観：大慧宗杲の「工夫」観との比較検討=Kokan Shiren’s 虎関師錬 View of Practice and Enlightenment: A Comparison with Dahui Zonggao’s 大慧宗杲 Theory of “Effort” 工夫 | ||
| 作者 | 佐久間祐惟 (著)=Sakuma, Yui (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.70 n.1 (總號=n.155) |
| 出版日期 | 2021.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 225 - 228 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 虎関師錬; 『正修論』; 修証観; 大慧宗杲 |
| 摘要 | This paper examines Kokan Shiren’s 虎関師錬 （1278-1346） view of practice 修 and enlightenment 証 by investigating the Shōshū-ron 正修論 and his “discourse records” 語録. Shiren’s understanding of enlightenment is largely based on the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna 大乗起信論, and he emphasizes the necessity of the continuous practice of “calming distracting thoughts through quiet sitting” 息慮静坐 as an “effort” （jpn. kufū; chn. gōngfū 工夫） to attain enlightenment. Furthermore, Shiren adopts the method of kanhua 看 話, developed by Dahui Zonggao 大慧宗杲 （1089-1163）, but at the same time he actively recommends the constant practice of quiet sitting, which helps in releasing karma. While Dahui advocates seeking the “unity of movement and stillness” 動静一如 through “effort” and criticizes the bias toward “stillness” （i.e., quiet sitting）, Shiren rejects these arguments and uses the phrase positively, which Dahui criticized as expressing the state of silent illumination Chan 黙照禅, as the enlightened state 悟境. Therefore, Shiren did not completely accept Dahui’s ideas in his theory of practice and enlightenment. |
| 目次 | 一 緒言 225 二 虎関師錬の修証観 225 三 看話の受容——大慧宗杲との比較—— 226 四 結語 227 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.1_225 |
| 點閱次數 | 248 |
| 建檔日期 | 2023.01.05 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.01.05 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
