![]() |
|
| Killing Gently by Means of the śyena: The Navya-Nyāya Analysis of Vedic and Secular Injunctions (vidhi) and Prohibitions (niṣedha) from the Perspective of Dynamic Deontic Logic | ||
| 作者 | Guhe, Eberhard (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Indian Philosophy |
| 卷期 | v.49 n.3 |
| 出版日期 | 2021.07 |
| 頁次 | 421 - 449 |
| 出版者 | Springer |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.springer.com/gp/ |
| 出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Indian Logic; Navya-Nya¯ya; Veda; vidhi; Dynamic Deontic Logic |
| 摘要 | In the present paper we model the Navya-Nyāya analysis of Vedic and secular injunctions and prohibitions by means of Giordani’s and Canavotto’s system ADL (“Action Deontic Logic”) of dynamic deontic logic. Navya-Naiyāyikas analyze the meaning of injunctions and prohibitions by reducing them to plain indicative statements about certain properties whose presence or absence in the enjoined or prohibited action serves as a criterion for the truth or falsity of the “inducing” or “restraining knowledge”, a kind of qualificative cognition instilled in the recipient of an injunction or prohibition. Thus, Navya-Naiyāyikas have found their own way to solve Jørgensen’s Puzzle concerning the very idea of a deontic logic as a tool to analyze arguments based on sentences which do not seem to be truth-apt. The teleological aspect of the Navya-Nyāya characterization of an enjoined or prohibited action can also give a clue to solutions of other puzzles and paradoxes which have beset the development of deontic logic in the West. A specific contrary-to-duty puzzle from the Indian tradition is related to the śyena, a malefic sacrifice meant for harming one’s enemy. The Vedic injunction to perform such a sacrifice runs counter to a religious practitioner’s duty not to harm a living being. In the present paper we examine the cogency of the very different solutions to this dilemma suggested by the Mīmāṃsaka Prabhākara on the one hand and the Navya-Naiyāyika Gaṅgeśa on the other hand. |
| 目次 | Abstract Introduction Defining Injunctions, Permissions and Prohibitions Informally Towards a Formal Analysis of the Navya-Naiyāyikas’ Interpretation of Injunctions and Prohibitions An Outline of the System ADL An ADL-Formalization of the Navya-Nyāya Analysis of Injunctions and Prohibitions The Navya-Nyāya Stance on the Issue of the Redundancy of (I3) The Momentousness of the Navya-Nyāya Approach with Regard to the Solution of Paradoxes and Puzzles in Deontic Logic Conclusion References |
| ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 130 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.12.30 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.12.30 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
