網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
A Buddhist Theory of Persistence: Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla on Rebirth
作者 Hayashi, Itsuki (著)
出處題名 Journal of Indian Philosophy
卷期v.47 n.5
出版日期2019.11
頁次979 - 1001
出版者Springer
出版者網址 http://www.springer.com/gp/
出版地Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言英文=English
關鍵詞Persistence; Rebirth; Causality; Physicalism; Shantaraksita
摘要The so-called Buddhist momentarists (kṣaṇabhaṅgavādin or kṣaṇikavādin), such as Dharmakīrti and his followers, defend the momentariness of all things. However, with equal force they also defend the persistence of all things, not just within a single lifetime but over an indefinite cycle of rebirth. Naturally, they have an interesting theory of persistence, according to which things persist without being self-identical over time. The theory is best presented in the Lokāyatāparīkṣā chapter of Śāntarakṣita’s Tattvasaṃgraha and Kamalaśīla’s Paṅjikā, as they clearly articulate the criteria of persistence without identity. The purpose of this paper is to formulate a Buddhist theory of persistence through the analysis of these texts. Here is the basic formula: Things persist as series (santāna), which is constituted by momentary entities that are causally related as upādāna and upādeya. Upādāna causal relation is demarcated from other causal relations by the principle of changeability with temporal restriction (Ut), and the principle adopts further qualifications to accommodate complex cases and personal persistence. I have addressed a problem that contemporary physicalism might pose a threat to the Buddhist account of personal persistence, and argued that the problem can be evaded by regarding persons as psycho-physical entities rather than strictly non-physical. In its general outlook, the Buddhist theory of persistence is close to Theodore Sider’s stage theory in that persistence is a matter of distinct individuals standing in a special causal relationship. As regards personal persistence, the Buddhist has a stricter condition than Parfit’s IDM thesis, which states that psychological connectedness with any cause is what matters for survival. The Buddhist would say it is moral connectedness (a specific kind of psychological connectedness) with a special cause called upādāna.

目次Abstract
Buddhist Theory of Persistence
Nature of Santāna
Upādāna Causal Connection
Proof of Past Life
Refutation of Body as upādāna in the Pañjikā
Consciousness in the Embryo
Refutation of Other Mind as upādāna in Tattvasaṃgraha
Proof of Future Life
Modern Physicalist Challenge
Conclusion: Anticipating a Comparative Discussion on Personal Persistence
References
ISSN00221791 (P); 15730395 (E)
點閱次數385
建檔日期2022.12.28
更新日期2022.12.28










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
660746

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽