![]() |
|
| Is dharma-nature identical to ignorance? A study of ‘ji 即’ in early Tiantai Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | Hung, Jenny (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East |
| 卷期 | v.30 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2020 |
| 頁次 | 307 - 323 |
| 出版者 | Routledge |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.routledge.com/ |
| 出版地 | Abingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Tiantai; Zhiyi; Chinese Buddhism; paradox; identity |
| 摘要 | Zhiyi (智顗) (538–597) is the most important scholar of Tiantai Buddhism. He uses the term ‘ji即,’ which is normally translated as ‘equals to’ or ‘is identical to,’ to illustrate the relation between two contradictory properties. Some examples are ‘ignorance equals ji 即 dharma-nature (wuming ji faxing 無明即法性),’ ‘saṃsāra ji 即 nirvāṇa (shengsi ji niepan 生死即涅槃),’ and ‘suffering ji 即 enlightenment (fannao ji puti 煩惱即菩提).’ In this essay, I investigate the meaning of ‘ji即’ in the sentence ‘ignorance ji 即 dharma-nature (wuming ji faxing 無明即法性)’ in the early Tiantai school. I propose that there are two ways to understand ‘ji 即’ in that sentence. I further argue that there is no logical contradiction involved when Zhiyi asserts it. |
| ISSN | 09552367 (P); 14692961 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2020.1846873 |
| 點閱次數 | 208 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.12.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.12.28 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
