 |
|
| From criticism to approval: A reconsideration of Ji’s Yogācāra position on Madhyamaka | ||
| 作者 | Lee, Sumi (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East |
| 卷期 | v.26 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2016 |
| 頁次 | 329 - 353 |
| 出版者 | Routledge |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.routledge.com/ |
| 出版地 | Abingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | East Asian Buddhism; Madhyamaka; Yogācāra; Ji 基 (632-682); Emptiness-Existence (kongyou 空有) controversy; Bhāvaviveka (ca. 500-570); Dharmapāla (ca. 6th century); the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra |
| 摘要 | Madhyamaka and Yogācāra are two Mahāyāna schools which have distinct systems. In the seventh century East Asia, the doctrinal distinction between the two schools was received as doctrinal contrast in the polemic circumstance of Emptiness-Existence (C. kongyou 空有) controversy. In this context, Ji 基 (632–682), the putative founder of East Asian Yogācāra school, has been normally considered by scholars to have advocated ‘Existence’ (viz., Yogācāra) in opposition to ‘Emptiness’ (viz., Madhyamaka). It is problematic, however, to brand Ji’s Yogācāra position simply as anti-Madhyamaka. Although Ji evidently expresses evident criticism on such a Madhyamaka exegete as Bhāvaviveka (ca. 500–570) in some of his works, he also describes Bhāvaviveka in an amicable or even respective way in other works. By analyzing Ji’s extant works, this article argues that Ji’s scholastic attitude toward Madhyamaka changed from criticism to approval. |
| ISSN | 09552367 (P); 14692961 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2016.1239309 |
| 點閱次數 | 76 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.12.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.12.26 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
