 |
|
| Deconstructing History of The Schisms of Early Buddhism and An Alternative Way to Understand Theravada and Mahasamghika School | ||
| 作者 | Channarong Boonnoon (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Buddhist Studies Chulalongkorn University |
| 卷期 | v.27 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2020 |
| 頁次 | 1 - 51 |
| 出版者 | Centre for Buddhist Studies, Chulalongkorn University |
| 出版地 | Thailand [泰國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 泰文=Thai |
| 關鍵詞 | Schisms; Theravada Buddhism; Mahasamghika; Cultural Pluralism |
| 摘要 | The objectives of this research are threefold: (1) to re-visit the schisms in Indian Buddhism during the 1st and 3rd Buddhist Centuries (543-200 B.C.) and the traditional accusations against the Mahasamghika and other schools as appeared in the Pali texts (the Tipitaka, Atthakathas, and Dipavamsa) of Theravada Buddhism; (2) to deconstruct the accusation that the Mahasamghika School was the origin of debilitated discipline and chasms among the Sangha after the passing away of the Buddha; and (3) to present a possible alternative to the way Theravada Buddhist identity has been constructed in Thai society. This possible alternative is inspired by a conversation with the multiculturalist position of Charles Taylor. Evidence from the 1st and 3rd centuries on this issue indicate that the traditional accusation may not be true without contestations. Traditional accusations indicate that the Mahasamghika was the cause of chasms, violated the Dhamma-Vinaya as compiled in the First Councils, was an enemy of Buddhism, and brought the decline and corruption to Buddhism. If the evidence and analysis from this study is well worth consideration, the longstanding beliefs that Theravada Buddhists are the only ones to maintain the pure Dhamma-Vinaya as compiled in the First Councils could be subjected to a re-evaluation. |
| ISSN | 08588325 (P); 2651219X (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 112 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.12.13 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.12.13 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
