網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
「反思判斷」與「一心開二門」-牟宗三先生所提哲學共同模型之再省察=Reflective Judgment and the Theory of "Twofold Existence created by One Mind": A Renewed Observation of Professor Mou Tsung-san's Idea of a Common Model for Philosophy
作者 吳甿 (著)=Ng, Ming (au.)
出處題名 鵝湖學誌=Legein semi-annual journal
卷期n.64
出版日期2020.06.01
頁次197 - 231
出版者東方人文學術研究基金會
出版地臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese
附註項本文原為香港中文大學哲學系「第八屆當代新儒學國際學術會議」論文。今訂正發表。
關鍵詞「一心開二門」="twofold existence created by one Mind"; 「反思判斷」=reflective judgment; 目的論=teleology; 自由=free; 實踐=practical
摘要《大乘起信論》有實在論意味的「一心開二門」提法,引發牟宗三先生想到將之作為哲學之理想共同模型,以之作判教之憑依。唯此一心開二門之「一心」,牟先生意謂是針對康德的哲學體系而言,「屬於道德的形上學或超絕的形上學的層次」。本文認為,由超絕的一心(自由無限心)自上而下地開二門,與《起信論》之「依一心法有二種門」,在實義上並不相應。依牟先生義之「一心開二門」哲學模型還判《起信論》、康德,則康德系統原是「二心開二門」,而《起信論》亦並不是在說唯一真心自上而下(「真心在纏」)地開二門。佛教最後必歸于無體無心無開無門無一無二無生。康德後在第三批判(《判斷力之批判》)提出「反思判斷力」這一心靈機能即着世間實感之感通感應,反省反思一一具體存在之「內在」與「超越」、「已在」與「未在」、「性相」與「目的」、「現實」與「理想」,而為「反思判斷心」之「一心開二門」;此則是從目的論而不是從本體實在論說的「一心開二門」。本文則更進言一實踐的、自我實現的、無目的而自由合目的的終極目的論之「一心開二門」。

The Awakening of Faith has a "Twofold Existence created by One Mind" with a fairly realistic tone, which inspires Professor Mou Tsung-san taking it as a common model of philosophies as well as the ground for critical distinction for different philosophies. For Mou this model means to be model for "moral metaphysics or transcendent metaphysics." In this paper, I argue that the teaching of "Twofold Existence created by One Mind" as a top-down creation from the transcendent Mind (free and infinite Mind) is different from the doctrine of "Two kinds of existence created by the operation of one Mind" as is shown in Twofold Existence with One Mind. If in return, I employ Mou's criteria in the critical examination of The Awakening of Faith and Kant, we could see that Kant's is a twofold existence created by two minds, and that of The Awakening of Faith is not one that created by the only true Mind (which is being trapped in ignorance). Buddhism is ultimately reduced at the end to a philosophy without reality, without Mind, without creating any level of being, without being one or two, and without production at all. In his third Critique, Kant proposes "reflective judgment" as a spiritual faculty that has real inter-communicative response with the world, with reflections on the immanent and transcendent, natural properties and ends, actual and ideal. This is a "twofold existence created by one Mind" from the point of view of teleology, but not from an ontological realism. In this paper, I venture further to raise a "twofold existence created by one Mind" in terms of a practical, self-realizing, and a non-teleological and freely in concurrence with the ultimate teleological theory.
目次摘要 198
一、「一心開二門」作為判教基型之提出 199
二、唯真心論之「一心開二門」與康德的哲學系統 200
三、以「一心開二門」還判《起信論》 204
四、佛教「一心開二門」之可說與不可說 210
五、康德哲學的人學體性學與「一心開二門」214
六、康德的哲學的二分,人學的三分,存在是「一」222
七、反思判斷:區分與連接 225
八、反思判斷與應當之理:超越的與存在的 229
ISSN10213732 (P)
點閱次數543
建檔日期2022.12.05
更新日期2022.12.05










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
657642

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽