 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
中観派における他生否定の歴史的展開:カマラシーラによる転換点=The Historical Development of the Negation of Arising from Other in Madhyamaka Tradition: The Turning Point by Kamalaśīla |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
吉水千鶴子 (著)=Yoshimizu, Chizuko (au.)
|
| 出處題名 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
| 卷期 | v.69 n.2 (總號=n.153) |
| 出版日期 | 2021.03.25 |
| 頁次 | 873 - 868 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | カマラシーラ; 『中観光明論』; 他生否定; 『中論』; 中観派 |
| 摘要 | The negation of arising from other in Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and its commentaries aimed to validate the ultimate Madhyamaka doctrine of non-arising by refuting the Ābhidharmika Buddhist view that a thing arises from its conditions. As epistemology and logic developed and debates took place between Buddhists and non-Buddhists, the theory of causality or the question of how to establish a causal relation became a point of interest for scholars, so that the Mādhyamikas faced the new task of disproving any means of establishing a real causal relation in order to defend their ultimate tenet of non-arising. Kamalaśīla’s discussion in his Madhyamakāloka is remarkable from this viewpoint; he thoroughly refutes various possibilities that ultimately things arise from something other–whether it is permanent or impermanent. Moving beyond the context of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and its commentarial tradition, he devotes a large portion of his argument to refuting the causal relation between momentary entities (kṣaṇika) that are considered to be real. This was definitely a new stage in the negation of arising in the history of Madhyamaka thought, which encouraged later Tibetan interpreters to further expand the scope of the discussion. |
| 目次 | 他生を認める前主張 872 他生否定の論理 871 先行する中観派の他生否定の検証 870 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.2_873 |
| 點閱次數 | 116 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.11.24 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.11.24 |


|
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。
|