The background of this research is based on a critical understanding of the differences in the residence of Buddhist samanа which emphasizes samana to choose forests and quiet places to practice inner development, whereas currently it does not support to stay in the forest in carrying out holy life. The purpose of this research is to describe the concept of samana residence, to describe the characteristics of the samana residence of the Buddhist era and the postmodern era, to elaborate the analysis of the similarities and differences in the residence of the Buddhist era and the postmodern era. The method used in this research is comparative research with discourse analysis and hermeneutics approach in the form of library studies. The reason for choosing discourse analysis and hermeneutics is because this study interprets and analyzes the text and historical context of the residence of the samana of the Buddhist era which is then compared to the current situation and examined in the form of literature. A suitable place for samana is a place to live that supports in living a holy life, a quiet place, and supports inner development. The similarities of the dwelling samana of the Buddhist era and the postmodern era can be grouped as follows: 1) based on usability, the function of the samana residence of the Buddhist era is to protect the samana from various kinds of disturbances so as to practice the Dhamma, 2) based on written rules, regulations in the Buddha's era it was still relevant if applied today, so that the samana was still guided by the Vinaya which was determined to maintain the sanctity of the samana. Analysis of the differences between the dwelling samana of the Buddhist era and the present: 1) based on geographical location, the residence of the Buddhist samana is located far away from the settlement (in the forest) and the current samana residence in rural and urban monasteries is very close to the activities of the population, 2) based on the situation and conditions, 3) based on characteristics, in the Buddhist era samana difficult to get four basic needs but the development of the mind quickly develops, while now it is easier to get the four basic needs but the development of the mind is slow development, 4) based on the pattern of life, the demands of the tasks and obligations of the current samana, which increasingly makes the samanas have a more modern residence in accordance with the times.
Latar belakang penelitian berdasarkan pemahaman kritis perbedaan kediaman samana zaman Buddha yang menekankan samana untuk memilih hutan dan tempattempat sepi untuk latihan pengembangan batin, sedangkan saat ini tidak mendukung untuk berdiam di hutan dalam menjalankan hidup suci. Tujuan dari penelitian yaitu, mendeskripsikan konsep kediaman samana, menjabarkan karakteristik kediaman samana zaman Buddha dan era postmodern, menjabarkan analisis persamaan dan perbedaan kediaman samana zaman Buddha dan era postmodern. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian komparatif dengan analisis wacana dan hermeneutika dalam bentuk studi kepustakaan. Alasan pemilihan analisis wacana dan hermeneutika karena penelitian ini menafsirkan dan menganalisis secara teks dan konteks sejarah kediaman samana zaman Buddha yang kemudian dibandingakan dengan keadaan saat ini dan dikaji dalam bentuk kepustakaan. Tempat tinggal yang sesuai bagi samana adalah tempat tinggal yang mendukung dalam menjalani hidup suci, tempat yang tenang, dan mendukung pengembangan batin. Persamaan kediaman samana zaman Buddha dan era postmodern dapat dikelompokkan sebagai berikut: 1) berdasarkan kegunaan, fungsi kediaman samana zaman Buddha adalah untuk melindungi samana dari berbagai macam gangguan sehingga dapat mempraktikkan Dhamma, 2) berdasarkan peraturan, peraturan yang tertulis pada zaman Buddha masih relevan jika diterapkan saat ini, sehingga samana tetap berpedoman pada vinaya yang telah ditetapkan untuk menjaga kesucian samana. Anali
目次
Abstrak 101 Pendahuluan 102 Metode 104 Pembahasan 105 Penutup 118 Daftar Referensi 119
