 |
|
| 漢訳アビダルマにおける宇宙論と『宿曜経』 | ||
| 作者 | Kotyk, Jeffrey (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 対法雑誌=Journal of Abhidharma Studies |
| 卷期 | v.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2021 |
| 頁次 | 101 - 108 |
| 出版者 | 対法雑誌刊行会 |
| 出版者網址 | https://sites.google.com/view/journalofabhidharmastudies |
| 出版地 | 神奈川, 日本 [Kanagawa, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 宿曜経; 宇宙論; 俱舎論; 天文学; 九執暦 |
| 摘要 | Chinese Buddhists adopted Indian cosmology based on Mount Sumeru and the Four Continents, which differed from native Chinese models. The four continents (Jambūdvīpa, Pūrvavideha, Avaragodānīya, and Uttarakuru) are positioned on a flat disc-shaped world. This was a type of flat earth cosmology that was documented in Abhidharma literature. The Buddhist canon does not mention a spherical earth, but Chinese monks were actually aware of an alternative cosmological model based on a spherical earth framework through the Jiuzhi li 九執曆 , a manual of Indian astronomy which was translated by Gautama Siddha in 718. This text introduced into Chinese the first instance of the concept of latitude (Skt. sva-deśa-akṣa). This sort of scientific theory based on a spherical earth model was already known by the mid-Tang. The Xiuyao jing 宿曜經 , compiled by Amoghavajra (705–774) in 759 with a subsequent revision in 764, not only adopts the cosmology outlined in Abhidharma texts, but also cites the Jiuzhi li. The issue at hand is why Amoghavajra and also the astronomer Yixing (673–727) never adopted cosmology based on a spherical earth. The present study will address these points. |
| 目次 | はじめに 漢訳アビダルマ文献における宇宙論と「惑星」の問題 『九執暦』の宇宙論 『宿曜経』の宇宙論と『九執暦』 結論 略号一覧 参照文献一覧 一次資料 |
| ISSN | 24355674 (P); 24355682 (E) |
| DOI | 10.34501/abhidharmastudies.2.0_101 |
| 點閱次數 | 424 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.11.18 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.11.18 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
