 |
|
| 敦煌文献中の三一権実論争関係資料=Controversy between the Three Vehicle and One Vehicle Theories in Dunhuang Manuscripts | ||
| 作者 | 小野嶋祥雄 (著)=Onoshima, Sachio (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.69 n.2 (總號=n.153) |
| 出版日期 | 2021.03.25 |
| 頁次 | 663 - 668 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 三一権実論争; 空有の論争; 敦煌文献; 『一乗仏性究竟論』; 曇曠; 道氤; 良賁 |
| 摘要 | It has been pointed out that there is a problem in the framework of intellectual history regarding the Three and One Vehicle theories presented by Tokiwa Daijo 常盤大定, which describes that Chinese controversy by focusing on the controversy between Tokuitsu 徳一and Saichō 最澄 in Japan. In this paper, in an attempt to revisit the historical framework of the controversy between the Three Vehicle and One Vehicle theories presented by Tokiwa, I examine the controversy between the Three Vehicle and One Vehicle Theories in Dunhuang manuscripts, and show that in the early Tang period: (1) Dunhuang manuscripts contain fragments of the Yisheng foxing jiujing lun 一乗仏性究竟論 by Fabao 法宝; (2) descriptions in the Dunhuang manuscripts related to the controversy between the Three Vehicle and One Vehicle theories fall under the influence of Daoyin 道氤 (668–740), who was influenced by Chinese Yogācāra and emphasized the One Vehicle theory; (3) discussions on the debate regarding emptiness and existence (空有諍論) in Dunhuang show a different aspect than the development of the debate in Japan. |
| 目次 | 一 問題の所在 663 二 敦煌文献中の法宝撰『一乗仏性究竟論』663 三 敦煌文献中の三一権実論争関係資料の特色 665 四 敦煌における「空有の論争」の独自展開 666 結語 667 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.2_663 |
| 點閱次數 | 304 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.10.07 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.07 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
