![]() |
|
| アティシャが説いた密教教義:『金剛座金剛歌』と『行歌』を中心に=Atiśa’s Vajrayāna Theory: On the Vajrāsanavajragīti and the Caryāgīti | ||
| 作者 | 朴熙彦 (著)=Pak, Hee-eon (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
| 出版日期 | 2020.12.25 |
| 頁次 | 356 - 352 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | アティシャ; 密教; マハームドラー; 『金剛座金剛歌』; 『行歌』 |
| 摘要 | The Vajrāsanavajragīti (Rdo rje gdan gyi rdo rje’i glu) and the Caryāgīti (Spyod pa’i glu) are works of Atiśa (982–1054) concerning Tantric Buddhism. Although Atiśa himself clarifies the Caryāgīti as the sequel to the Vajrāsanavajragīti, the relationship of those two works remains unclear in so far as the teachings of the Vajrāsanavajragīti are concerned with Vajrayāna, while the teachings of the Caryāgīti seem more concerned with Pāramitāyāna. In this paper, I first examine the teachings and the characteristics of those two works, focusing on the procedure of practice. Second, I examine the relationship between the two works, focusing on the terminology that Atiśa uses. Finally, I clarify that the Mahāmudrā tradition plays an important role in Atiśa’s Vajrayāna theory. |
| 目次 | 1.はじめに 356 2.『金剛座金剛歌』について 356 3.『行歌』について 355 4.両文献の関係について 353 5.小結 353 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_356 |
| 點閱次數 | 126 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.10.05 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.05 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
