 |
|
| 『往生要集義記』における法然の『往生要集』解釈：持戒の要否をめぐって=Hōnen’s Interpretation of the Ōjōyōshū in the Ōjōyōshū-giki: The Necessity or Non-necessity of Keeping Precepts | ||
| 作者 | 下端啓介 (著)=Shimobata, Keisuke (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
| 出版日期 | 2020.12.25 |
| 頁次 | 132 - 135 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 『往生要集義記』; 持戒; 源信; 法然; 良忠 |
| 摘要 | Hōnen argues in his Ōjōyōshū-shaku 往生要集釈 that “the essentials for rebirth in the Pure Land” explained in chapter five of Genshin’s 源信 (942–1017) Ōjōyōshū, “Jonen hōhō (助念方法)”, are not the main point of the book. This theory is derived from the phrase that keeping the precepts is unnecessary for rebirth in the Pure Land. But there also appears in the Ōjōyōshū a remark that encourages keeping the precepts. Therefore, Hōnen’s interpretation cannot be said to be sufficiently convinced, and Ryōchū 良忠 (1199–1287), therefore, provides a supplementary explanation for that interpretation in his Ōjōyōshū-giki 往生要集義記.Ryōchū, dealing with these contradictory ideas found in the Ōjōyōshū, explains that keeping the precepts is unnecessary to obtain rebirth in Amida’s Pure Land from the perspective that the purpose of Genshin’s work is to convert those with lower religious capacities. |
| 目次 | 一 はじめに 132 二 持戒の要否についての解釈 133 三 持戒の勧化についての解釈 134 四 おわりに 135 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_132 |
| 點閱次數 | 170 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.10.05 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.05 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
