 |
|
| 虎関師錬著『正修論』における禅風批判について：葛藤禅批判を中心として=Criticism of Zen Styles in Kokan Shiren’s 虎関師錬 Shōshū ron 正修論: The Criticism of kattō zen 葛藤禅 | ||
| 作者 | 佐久間祐惟 (著)=Sakuma, Yui (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
| 出版日期 | 2020.12.25 |
| 頁次 | 108 - 111 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 関虎師錬; 『正修論』; 葛藤禅; 知解宗 |
| 摘要 | In the seventh chapter of the Shōshū ron 正修論 entitled ‘Shichiwaku’ 質惑,Kokan Shiren 虎関師錬 (1278–1346) classified Zen styles of teaching and practices that existed around him into four types: byōjitsu zen 平実禅,mokushō zen 黙照禅,kattō zen 葛藤禅,and tongyō zen 頓教禅,and criticized each of them. This paper focuses on his criticism of kattō zen (wordy Zen), and examines the content and doctrinal background of this criticism. According to Shiren, kattō zen refers to the Heze School 荷沢宗 of Chan, which was first established by Heze Shenhui 荷沢神会 (684–758), and expanded by Guifeng Zongmi 圭峰宗密 (780–841); it is also known as the Chige (ch. Zhijie) school 知解宗,which promotes “knowing” (jp. chi; ch. zhi 知) as true nature (jp. shinshō; ch. zhenxing 真性). Shiren criticized the kattō zen of the Chige school because, he thought, followers of the school did not distinguish true nature, which he believed originally cannot be revealed by using language, from verbal expression. In addition, the fact that Shiren criticized kattō zen in his Shōshū ron, despite there being no direct lineage of the Heze School in Japan, makes us presume the great influence of the thought of the Heze School (in particular, Zongmi’s thought) on Zen in Japan at the time of Shiren. |
| 目次 | 一 緒言 108 二 「葛藤禅」及び「知解の宗」という呼称 108 三 葛藤禅批判の内容と背景 110 四 結語 110 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_108 |
| 點閱次數 | 156 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.10.04 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.04 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
