 |
|
| 四善根位の定についての一考察=The Dhyāna of the Four kuśalamūla | ||
| 作者 | 水野和彦 (著)=Mizuno, Kazuhiko (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.68 n.2 (總號=n.150) |
| 出版日期 | 2020.03.20 |
| 頁次 | 1001 - 997 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 四善根; 聞思修; 順決択分; 順解脱分; 定慧 |
| 摘要 | In this paper, I examine dhyāna in the stage of the catvāri kuśala-mūlāni (四善根, “four roots of good,” below CKM) of the Sarvāstivādins. It is generally accounted that the nature of CKM is prajñā (慧), but it presumes dhyāna practice. What did the Sarvāstivādins think about the element of dhyāna at this stage of applied practice? By focusing on this theme, I think we can dicover the characteristics and diversity of complex Abhidharma ideas. Firstly, it is mentioned the CKM’s basis is rūpāvacara. The Sarvāstivāda says that this prajñā is bhāvanāmayī (修所成). The bhāvanāmayī prajñā is the third of the three prajñā (三慧), the previous two being śrutamayī (聞所成) and cintāmayī (思所成). The Sarvāstivāda defines each of these according to their sphere of applications as, respectively, name (śrutamayī), name and sense (cintāmayī), and sense (bhāvanāmayī). On the other hand, Vasubandhu, the author of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, held that cintāmayī refers to thinking about the truth and bhāvanāmayī is the wisdom based on samādhī, and he distinguished between the two. Secondly, in the theory of the darśana-mārga divided into three parts (順三分), the CKM is the nirvedhabhāgīya (順決択分, conducive to certainty) , and is the stage of defining the truths. The previous (second) stage, mokṣabhāgīya (順解脱分), the stage of planting the seeds of nirvāṇa, is manaskarma. The Sarvāstivāda defines these as śrutamayī and cintāmayī. This three parts theory only explains cause and effect, and does not speak of a continuous training in dhyāna and prajñā. The Sarvāstivāda tries to interpret both practical training and causal thoery in the same framework of śruta, cintā and bhāvanā. Therefore I think there may have been a difference in the definition of these three wisdoms. |
| 目次 | はじめに 1001 1. 四善根位は色界繋（六地）であり，修所成である． 1001 2. 三慧（聞，思，修所成）とはどのような相か 1000 3. 順三分における決択分の位置づけ 999 まとめ 998 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.2_1001 |
| 點閱次數 | 210 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.09.29 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.29 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
