![]() |
|
| 天台教判における頓教説の展開:智顗説と湛然釈の相違点=The Development of the Sudden Teaching in Tiantai’s Classification of Sūtras: The Difference between Zhiyi and Zhanran | ||
| 作者 | 矢島礼迪 (著)=Yajima, Norimichi (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.68 n.2 (總號=n.150) |
| 出版日期 | 2020.03.20 |
| 頁次 | 768 - 771 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 教相判釈; 五時八教; 頓教 |
| 摘要 | This paper focuses on the concept of Sudden Teaching 頓教 in Tiantai’s classification of sūtras, and investigates the difference between Zhiyi 智顗 (538–597) and Zhanran 湛然 (711–782). The concept of Sudden Teaching existed before Zhiyi, but he insisted on developing his own theory against those pre-existing, such as the group of taxonomies known as ‘three in the south and seven in the north’ 南三北七. In contrast to Zhiyi, Zhanran embraced these pre-existing theories, and re-interpreted Zhiyi’s classification of sūtras. This paper concludes that Zhanran inherited Zhiyi’s theory and embraced these pre-existing theories. |
| 目次 | 一 はじめに 768 二 南三北七の頓教説と智顗の頓教説 768 三 湛然の頓教説 770 四 小結 770 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.2_768 |
| 點閱次數 | 168 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.09.27 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.27 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
