 |
|
| 決定業としての念仏：珍海撰『決定往生集』における解釈=Nenbutsu as Ketsujō-gō 決定業: The Interpretation in the Ketsujō ōjōshū 決定往生集 of Chinkai 珍海 | ||
| 作者 | 成瀬隆順 (著)=Naruse, Takayuki (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.68 n.2 (總號=n.150) |
| 出版日期 | 2020.03.20 |
| 頁次 | 567 - 572 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 珍海; 『決定往生集』; 『三論名教抄』; 善導『観経疏』正定之業; 決定業; 定業 |
| 摘要 | In Chapter V of the Ketsujō ōjōshū 決定往生集 written by Chinkai 珍海 (1092–1152), it is pointed out that an act of making a Buddhist image, reading or copying Mahāyāna Buddhist scriptures is able to become a fixed karma (定業). Through a similar statement in his early work, the Bodaishinshū 菩提心集, it is confirmed that the fixed karma is Ketsujō-gō決定業. In addition, discussing the superiority and inferiority of the ten-fold repitition of the nenbutsu (jūnen 十念) in daily life and at the end of life, he clearly interprets both as Ketsujō-gō in the same chapter. However, given that out of all kinds of Mahāyāna karmas in the Sanron myōkyōshō 三論名教抄 the Ketsujō-gō is missing, a clear contradiction appears in identifying nenbutsu with Ketsujō-gō. Therefore Chinkai shows that rebirth in the Pure Land is enabled by nenbutsu as Ketsujō-gō with a theory that there is no Ketsujō-gō in itself, but only Ketsujō-gō as a relationship. |
| 目次 | 一 問題の所在 567 二『名教抄』「四業義」に示される決定業 567 三 『決定往生集』に示される決定業としての念仏 568 四 決定業としての念仏に対する矛盾の解決 570 五 小結 571 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.2_567 |
| 點閱次數 | 139 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.09.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.26 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
