 |
|
| 『五蘊論釈』の法処所摂色におけるスティラマティの註釈態度について=Sthiramati’s Commentary on the Content of Dharmāyatana in the Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā | ||
| 作者 | 清水尚史 (著)=Shimizu, Naofumi (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149) |
| 出版日期 | 2019.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 390 - 387 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 安慧; スティラマティ; 五蘊論釈; 法処所摂色 |
| 摘要 | This essay studies Sthiramati’s view of dharmāyatana in the Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā (PSkV). Sthiramati accepts five types of dharmāyatana, just as does Asaṅga in the Abhidharmasamuccaya (AS). However, Vasubandhu explains only avijñapti in the Pañcaskandhaka (PSk). The five types of dharmāyatana are ābhisaṅkṣepika, ābhyavakāśika, sāmādānika, parikalpita, and vaibhūtvika. Among them, sāmādānika corresponds to avijñapti. Sthiramati commented on why the four types were not mentioned in PSk. First, Sthiramati commented that ābhisaṅkṣepika and ābhyavakāśika were not re-explained as dharmāyatana because they were not different from paramāṇu. Next, for parikalpita and vaibhūtvika, both are the same as vijñāna, so it is interpreted that it was not explained as dharmāyatana. Therefore, Sthiramati understands that Vasubandhu did not deny the four kinds of dharmāyatana, but didn’t dare to explain it. There is no negative attitude toward Vasubandhu in Sthiramati’s commentarial attitude in the PSkV, and this clearly shows the character of PSk as a short text (saṃkṣepita). |
| 目次 | 『五蘊論釈』の法処所摂色に関するスティラマティ註について 390 極略色と極䋽色が説かれない理由 390 遍計所起色と自在所生色が説かれない理由 388 結論 388 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_390 |
| 點閱次數 | 554 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.09.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.23 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
